We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. Ford Ranger Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 116 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler PT Cruiser and 141 fuel economy reports for the Ford Ranger.

Chrysler PT Cruiser g/100m

Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2010 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2009 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2008 5.3 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2008 7.6 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2008 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2007 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2007 5.5 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 6.9 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 4.1 MPG Highway Percentage 52 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 4.1 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 20.5 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 13.9 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 18.6 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 4.6 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2003 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2003 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 11 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2003 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 73 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2003 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 4.6 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler PT Cruiser 2001 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2010 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 10 40 20 30 55 3.7  
2009 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 9 4 8 80 64 4.3  
2008 4dr Wagon turbocharged 180hp 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med hvy 0 20 70 10 60 5.3  
2008 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 9 31 22 39 72 7.6  
2008 2dr Convertible turbocharged 180hp 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat v.lt light 6 10 18 66 68 4.7  
2007 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
hills med none 1 4 50 45 65 4.4  
2007 2dr Convertible 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 0 0 95 5 65 5.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2006 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 1 11 5 83 70 6.9  
2006 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 3 35 23 39 64 5.1  
2006 2dr Convertible 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 75 5 60 4.0  
2006 2dr Convertible 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 5 45 0 50 70 4.8  
2005 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 3 3 25 70 63 3.8  
2005 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 7 11 30 52 60 4.1  
2005 2dr Convertible turbocharged 230hp 2.4L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 1 6 26 68 64 4.1  
2004 4dr Wagon turbocharged 220hp 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 5 5 30 60 120 20.5  
2004 4dr Wagon turbocharged 220hp 2.4L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills light light 7 20 26 48 93 13.9  
2004 4dr Wagon turbocharged 119hp 2.1L I4 Diesel
5-speed manual FWD
flat light light 33 33 0 34 130 18.6  
2004 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 50 30 10 60 4.6  
2004 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 5 10 48 38 67 4.3  
2003 4dr Wagon turbocharged 215hp 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 4 21 18 57 79 9.4  
2003 4dr Wagon turbocharged 215hp 2.4L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light hvy 17 28 44 11 65 4.0  
2003 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills light none 3 10 15 73 105 27.0  
2003 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 5 11 33 50 61 4.4  
2002 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 9 10 14 68 70 4.6  
2001 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
hills light light 14 11 15 60 63 4.7  

Return to top

Ford Ranger g/100m

Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2021 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2020 4.1 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2011 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2010 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2010 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2009 43.0 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2009 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 34.5 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 5.3 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 39.7 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 6.0 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 28.8 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 44.7 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 5.9 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 6.0 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 3.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 6.4 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 5.6 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 5.5 MPG Highway Percentage 84 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 6.0 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 6.8 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 6.0 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2001 5.4 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 33.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2021 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4
10-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 20 0 80 100 27.0  
2020 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4
10-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light hvy 10 40 50 0 0 4.1  
2011 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 27 13 60 68 4.9  
2010 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 10 10 10 70 100 27.1  
2010 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 9 36 0 55 75 3.7  
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med hvy 8 48 10 35 120 43.0  
2009 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 20 0 80 65 3.7  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 5 50 0 45 100 34.5  
2008 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 10 10 10 70 65 5.3  
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 0 53 0 47 107 39.7  
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 0 53 47 65 6.0  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 10 16 20 54 100 28.8  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 25 35 25 15 110 44.7  
2006 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 20 10 35 35 75 5.9  
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 50 20 30 60 6.0  
2005 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat light light 5 20 35 40 60 3.3  
2005 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 10 60 10 20 75 6.4  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 20 70 55 5.0  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills light light 0 0 5 95 65 5.6  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 0 20 10 70 75 4.7  
2004 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 10 30 40 20 60 3.7  
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med hvy 1 5 10 84 70 5.5  
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 9 38 20 34 69 6.0  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 5 10 5 80 60 4.7  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med none 0 3 3 95 70 5.2  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 25 65 65 4.4  
2003 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 8 8 21 64 65 4.0  
2003 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 0 90 10 70 6.8  
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 0 18 0 82 74 6.0  
2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 146-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat v.lt none 10 10 10 70 60 4.5  
2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 135-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 48 35 18 75 3.9  
2001 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light hvy 0 0 30 70 60 5.4  
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 0 0 20 80 100 33.9  
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 100 0 0 0 0 8.7  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Ranger fuel economy data.

Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. Ford Ranger Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chrysler PT Cruiser and Ford Ranger's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chrysler models and Ford models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chrysler PT Cruiser

Chrysler PT Cruiser Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
For a car that weights over 3100 lbs and has this much room inside, the 22-24 mpg is not bad. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2006 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good. My personal commuter. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2004 4dr Wagon turbocharged 220hp 2.4L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Good compromize between performance and fuel economy, with most cars the gas milage is proportional to the right foot. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2002 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
the cruiser only sips never guzzles, i can go a week on a tank of gas. thankfully, prices are back to normal. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
Chrysler PT Cruiser Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
For size of vehicle, fuel economy should be 40% better. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2008 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
For a 4 cyl engine it really show get a little better MPG. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2007 2dr Convertible turbocharged 180hp 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
It averages around 15 in town and no better than 20 highway. This is way behind the curve of other more modern small cars. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2006 2dr Convertible turbocharged 230hp 2.4L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
One would expect to get much better mileage from a car this size, however 17 city/23 highway is what I actually get. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2006 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
This thing had a 4 cylinder but sucked fuel like a big V-6 or larger. Is this the result of cinder-block like aerodynamics? see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2005 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Manual transmission with standard 4 cylender engine averages 25 mpg. Power is just adequate. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2004 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Poorer than I expected, not much better than my Porsche! see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2003 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Poor highway fuel economy, compared to Vibe. Poor city fuel economy, compared to Vibe. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2003 4dr Wagon turbocharged 215hp 2.4L I4
4-speed shiftable automatic FWD
I have a 91 8 cylinder truck that gets better gas mileage see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
2002 4dr Wagon 150-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
19 MPG on average is just pathetic for a four-cylinder. see full Chrysler PT Cruiser review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
Could be better. Right now getting a nudge over 20mpg each tank, which is somewhat expected but could still be better. see full Ford Ranger review
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
2009 4.0L 4x4 with Auto is just HORRIBLE for fuel mileage - all these trucks with the 4.0L are! Although the Ford Ranger has an excellent and proven track record for reliability and the new vehicle pricing was very competitive, I could have purchased a larger more expensive truck with a V8 and more features and by this time I'm sure that I could have broken even if you consider how much the Ranger has cost me in additional fuel costs. Although I'm confident that this little Ranger will last for years, I'm afraid that I will be trading it earlier than I would have wanted to find something that is not such a gas guzzler. see full Ford Ranger review
2008 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Ford needs to wake up to the cost of gas - All you can get now in a 4x4 is the 4.0L engine - That motor eats gas. Ford I want the option of a 3.0 L and even a 2.3L 4x4 see full Ford Ranger review
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
With todays gas prices I would have liked to have the option of a smaller motor. The 4.0L can really drink fuel see full Ford Ranger review
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
I average anywhere between 16 and 19 mpg, I believe that Ford could achieve alot better fuel economy out of a truck the size of a Ranger that doesnt even have a V8 see full Ford Ranger review
2003 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. see full Ford Ranger review
2001 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed manual RWD
V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better see full Ford Ranger review