What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Dodge Challenger
2013 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2013
2dr Coupe 375-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD
I am a large person, being 6'4" tall and about 250 lbs. This car fits me great, with plenty of room and comfort. I am the driver always (I live alone) and don't often have anyone else with me, although on occasion, I have a passenger. Even with large passengers there is plenty of room in the interior. I have a couple of inches of head room, which is pretty unique. Most cars require me to recline the seat a notch or two in order to avoid having my head in the headliner. I DID NOT purchase a vehicle with a sunroof. That device eats up 2 inches of head room, and I would be right there. Besides, we get a lot of rain here on the coast and I would be afraid of leaks.
The seats are supportive, and I have the 6 way power driver's seat. It is easily adjustable for position and has the adjustable lumbar support. I cannot imagine anyone not being able to be comfortable. There is also plenty of leg room in the front seats. The back seats are useful in a pinch, but if I had a family, this would likely not be the best choice of vehicle for me. Although I love driving it, and looking at it!
see full Dodge Challenger review
2013 Dodge Challenger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2012
2dr Coupe 372-horsepower 5.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
While probably OK for short trips, but would not be comfortable for longer cruise even for small passengers
see full Dodge Challenger review
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Acura MDX
2013 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Comment
2012
That's it for the significant advantages of the new Acura MDX. Most things it does well, but not significantly better than the generally good segment averages. It's quick, but not thrillingly so. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, and cushier than those in the Infiniti, but provide less lateral support than those in the smaller Acura RDX and are no match in comfort or support for those in a BMW X5, a Lexus RX, or the big buck Mercedes reviewed a few weeks ago. Ride quality, like the seats, is good but short of luxurious. With additional sound deadening and laminated front door glass, the 2014 MDX is quieter than the 2013, but this only brings it in line with the others.
By the same token, there aren't many clear reasons to reject the 2014 MDX. The most obvious follows from its relatively compact size: though (as already mentioned) cargo volume is more than competitive, there's less room in the rearmost row than in the QX60. By sliding the second row up a couple of inches (it has a half-foot of travel), adults of middling size will fit back there. But with their butt low and knees high they won't be comfortable.
The QX60 offers far more combined legroom based on the spec sheets, and a couple more inches in the real world. (The Acura's specs seem to under-represent reality for passengers even as they might over-represent it for cargo.) But the Infiniti's seats are flatter and less comfortable. The new Hyundai Santa Fe offers more legroom than the Infiniti, while Ford's large crossovers could be best of all for transporting up to seven adults--if still not as good as the typical minivan.
see full Acura MDX review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Acura MDX
2013 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year
Body/Powertrain
Comment
2012
4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura.
see full Acura MDX review
