We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Explorer Sport Trac vs. Mercury Milan Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 28 fuel economy reports for the Ford Explorer Sport Trac and 88 fuel economy reports for the Mercury Milan.

Ford Explorer Sport Trac g/100m

Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2010 6.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2008 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2008 7.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2007 5.3 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2007 6.3 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2007 5.6 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2005 6.1 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2004 5.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2004 5.7 MPG Highway Percentage 94 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2003 5.9 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Ford Explorer Sport Trac Ford Explorer Sport Trac 2001 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2010 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 0 25 28 48 70 6.1  
2008 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med light 2 2 50 47 58 7.1  
2008 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 5 10 65 20 68 7.2  
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 0 15 60 25 60 5.3  
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 10 20 23 47 63 6.3  
2007 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 3 53 35 10 60 5.6  
2005 4dr SUT 205-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 0 0 20 80 70 6.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2004 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat lead light 10 30 20 40 75 5.0  
2004 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light none 0 0 6 94 67 5.7  
2003 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 5 30 38 28 68 5.9  
2001 4dr SUT 203-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light none 0 10 55 35 60 7.1  

Return to top

Mercury Milan g/100m

Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2010 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2010 3.2 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2009 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2009 5.6 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2009 3.9 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2008 2.8 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2008 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2008 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2007 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 28 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2007 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2007 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Mercury Milan Mercury Milan 2006 3.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2010 4dr Sedan 240-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 3 16 19 63 73 4.0  
2010 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 6 10 42 42 66 3.2  
2009 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
hills med none 6 5 10 80 65 4.0  
2009 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
hills light light 5 80 10 5 65 5.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
hills med hvy 6 20 38 36 70 3.9  
2008 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 8 13 5 75 65 2.8  
2008 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med hvy 10 15 5 70 80 3.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 3 35 7 55 64 4.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 18 20 35 28 68 4.5  
2007 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
hills med hvy 0 25 0 75 75 4.9  
2007 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 8 16 19 58 69 3.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 0 16 34 50 66 3.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mercury Milan fuel economy data.

Ford Explorer Sport Trac vs. Mercury Milan Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Explorer Sport Trac and Mercury Milan's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUTs
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Mercury models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Explorer Sport Trac

Ford Explorer Sport Trac Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
99 Dodge Durango with 5.9 V8 got better fuel economy with same driving habits. Expected better with smaller V8 and 6 speed trans. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
2008 4dr SUT 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Terrible. I've owned fullsize pickups and SUV so I know what to expect. I've never seen the average mpg display read over 15mpg for the six months I've owned it. The main reason I bought this was the combination AWD and 4WD transfer case, but it doesn't have a 2 wheel drive position like my Sierra did. Boy do I miss that, I averaged 20 mpg per tank. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
highway mileage is very good, better than my lighter V6 Ranger; 21mpg on the highway @ 75mph on flat road. City, with the remote start in winter, with the AWD kicking in, and lead foot acceleration nets me 13mpg. A light foot can get 15mpg city see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
2002 4dr SUT 203-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I think we all wish for 30 mpd-thats unrealistic when you have 10000+ lbs on the road when towing. see full Ford Explorer Sport Trac review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mercury Milan

Mercury Milan Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
MPG up to 34 hwy, no less than 25 in heavy traffic. 17 gal tank gives you around 500 mile range between gas stations. see full Mercury Milan review
2007 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
The economy is amazing and not compromised. see full Mercury Milan review
2007 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
I can carry my family, in comfort, for long trips and still get 30mpg+. Around town driving returns 23+ mpg. This mileage is within 2-3 mpg of the smaller 2003 Focus we replaced. see full Mercury Milan review
2006 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
I have seen as high as 34.5 mpg at 57mph. see full Mercury Milan review
2006 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Avg. 25+, very goood for a car this size see full Mercury Milan review
2006 0 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
Was match competitively with similar models, see full Mercury Milan review
2006 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
We consistently get around 30 MPG - and this is computed from amount of fuel and miles travelled, not from the "trip computer." This is a darn nice-size car to deliver that kind of fuel economy. see full Mercury Milan review
Mercury Milan Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Hyundi Sonata with similar size engine and a 5-speed automatic delivers 22/32. Malibu with a 2.4 and a 6-speed delivers 22/32. Focus/Milan with a 2.3 and 5-speed auto 20/28. Initial freeway driving is consistent in the 28-30 mpg range. Competitors better. see full Mercury Milan review