| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2000 Ford F-150 and 2012 Acura MDX Specifications
| Model Year | 2000 | 2012 | |
| Model | Ford F-150 | Acura MDX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Ford F-150
| 2000 Ford F-150 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2001 | 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 202-horsepower 4.2L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
This is a key part of my choice for any vehicle. Driver's seat has adjustable front-back, up-down, seat tilt, elevation & lumbar support. I also have a 1983 F250 HD pickup with an old-fashioned bench seat. This is actually more comfortable than the much fancier seat in my 2001 F150. However, both are very comfortable. The longest drive I ever took in my F150 was about 20 hours out of 24, where I covered 750 miles. I took frequent rest breaks, felt just fine at the end of this very long driving session. see full Ford F-150 review |
| 2000 | 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 220-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
0 see full Ford F-150 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Acura MDX
| 2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
