| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Ford Focus and 2009 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Ford Focus | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.3 in | 107.1 in | -2.8 in |
| Length | 178.5 in | 187.6 in | -9.1 in |
| Width | 71.8 in | 73.9 in | -2.1 in |
| Height | 57.7 in | 55.4 in | 2.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2907 lb. | 3373 lb. | -466 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 12.4 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -3.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.3 in | 38.6 in | -0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.6 in | 55.4 in | 0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.9 in | 53.6 in | 0.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 42.7 in | -0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 34.7 in | 3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.7 in | 53.4 in | 0.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.7 in | 46.8 in | 5.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.2 in | 30.3 in | 2.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 2.1 in |
| Cargo Volume | 13.2 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | 0.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Focus
| 2012 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Like other recently designed Fords, the Focus has a tighter rear seat than most competitors. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with perhaps an inch to spare. see full Ford Focus review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Focus
| 2012 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat see full Ford Focus review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Mustang
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
