Ford Focus (2012) vs. Ford Ranger (2000) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Ford Focus and 2000 Ford Ranger specs .
2012 Ford Focus and 2000 Ford Ranger Specifications
Model Year
2012
2000
Model
Ford Focus
Ford Ranger
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body
Difference
Total Legroom
0 in (over 1 rows)
0 in (over 1 rows)
0 in
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Focus
2012 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons Year Comment
Like other recently designed Fords, the Focus has a tighter rear seat than most competitors. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with perhaps an inch to spare.
see full Ford Focus review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Focus
2012 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons Year Body/Powertrain Comment
2012 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat
see full Ford Focus review
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Ford Ranger
2000 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons Year Body/Powertrain Comment
2001 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4
Standard cab leg room not good for anyone over 6 ft
see full Ford Ranger review 2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
Too small for anyone over the age of ten.
see full Ford Ranger review
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans ,
Coupes ,
Hatchbacks , and
Wagons .
See TrueDelta's information for all
Ford models .
