| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Ford Mustang and 2009 Acura MDX Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2009 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Acura MDX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,751 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,844 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,994 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,382 mm | 1,732 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 2,057 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 79 L | -18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 996 mm | -41 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 980 mm | -96 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 983 mm | -206 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 907 mm | -907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,067 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 739 mm | -739 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,769 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 425 L | -43 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.5 | 1,215 L | 12.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,364 L | 11.5 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Acura MDX
| 2009 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Vehicle is wide, and it feels very room from boht the drivers' and passengers' sides. see full Acura MDX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
It was the most comfortable of the vehicles we tested, including the Volvo XC90, Toyota Highlander Hybrid Limited, and Mazda CX-9 Grand Touring. Soft leather, supportive seats. see full Acura MDX review |
| 2009 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Claustrophic, unusable 3rd row, with immovable knee-wall see full Acura MDX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
