Model Year | 2015 | 2008 | |
Model | Ford Mustang | Jeep Wrangler | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,783 mm | 4,684 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,915 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,382 mm | 1,836 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,599 kg | 1,896 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 82 L | -21 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,049 mm | 954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 884 mm | 1,024 mm | 883 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,326 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,204 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 777 mm | 945 mm | -168 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,986 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 382 L | 1,314 L | 381 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.5 | 2,322 L | 11.5 |
2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
2008 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 6-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It is big enough that I can take three passengers in relative comfort, considering the type of vehicle that it is. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
extra two seats plus a cargo area make for a great family vehicle/ hauler see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2008 Jeep Wrangler Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not really comfortable for a long trip for an adult.... great for the dogs see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
The seats are not as comfortable as my trucks seats were. They are pretty basic but so is all of the interior of the Wrangler. It is made to get dirty, not look good or be comfortable. see full Jeep Wrangler review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 202-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Still small, despite the increased size of the vehicle. see full Jeep Wrangler review |