| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2006 Lincoln Navigator Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2006 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Lincoln Navigator | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 3,018 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 5,271 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,999 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,974 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 2,520 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 106 L | -45 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,006 mm | 977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,608 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 1,008 mm | 880 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,610 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 983 mm | -226 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,328 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,275 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,951 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 518 L | -139 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.4 | 1,546 L | 12.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 2,968 L | 11.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Lincoln Navigator
| 2006 Lincoln Navigator Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The rear console is a bad idea. There's no way for the kids to get to the back seat while driving. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic RWD |
The driver's seat is exceedingly comfortable. Its heating and cooling features work quickly and effectively. The adjustable lumbar support is in the right place to be effective without being intrusive, and the large cushion effectively supports the my legs. As an athlete who is almost always sore or injured, I very much appreciate that the seat is high enough off the floor that my lower legs are reasonably vertical. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
