| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Ford Mustang and 2010 Nissan Rogue Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Nissan Rogue | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 105.9 in | 1.2 in |
| Length | 188.1 in | 182.9 in | 5.2 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 70.9 in | 3 in |
| Height | 55.6 in | 65.3 in | -9.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 3447 lb. | 3267 lb. | 180 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 15.9 gal. | 0.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 40.4 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 55.9 in | -0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 53.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.5 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 38.3 in | -3.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.6 in | 53.6 in | -2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 46.8 in | 51.2 in | -4.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.8 in | 35.3 in | -5.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | -5.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.4 ft3 | 28.9 ft3 | -15.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 ft3 | 57.9 ft3 | -44.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan Rogue
| 2010 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Not great, not awful. Compared to my previous BMW 535i, it's awful, but for the class of vehicle it's OK for shorter distances, which is mostly what I use it for. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
holds my three young kids comfortably, like the flat foot room. I don't like the front seats, I find them too flat and I don't like that they dont tilt back like my TSX see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Picked up one of my fat friends while on the test ride and had him ride in the back. Him and his wife were very comfortable. Lots of leg and foot room. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Lots of leg room and the drivers seat is very adjustable and comfortable. I have wide shoulders and the leather seats are very comfortable for me. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Front seats too bench like and lacking in adjustments see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Roof pitch makes it seem more cramped. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
uncomfortable for 6 ft 2 in driver see full Nissan Rogue review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
