| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Ford Mustang and 2008 Volvo C30 Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2008 | |
| Model | Ford Mustang | Volvo C30 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,720 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,788 mm | 4,252 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,877 mm | 1,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,417 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,588 kg | 1,452 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 60 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 970 mm | 8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,349 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 881 mm | 925 mm | -44 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,214 mm | 1,194 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,189 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 757 mm | 861 mm | -104 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,935 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 379 L | 365 L | 14 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.4 | 572 L | -558.6 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Volvo C30
| 2008 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I tested both the Mini Cooper and Volvo C30. The C30, by far, is the most comfortable and easy to find a great driving position. Driving from Los Angeles to San Francisco without any back or shoulder fatigue! see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I have sat in the seat for three plus hours with no discomfort. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats are a bit short on leg room. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat room is tight, this is a small hatch coupe afterall. see full Volvo C30 review |
| 2008 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seat is really make for children and not adults see full Volvo C30 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models.
