MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Taurus X vs. Toyota Celica Fuel Economy (g/100m)

The graph does not display if there are fewer than five results.
Chart is based on 267 fuel economy reports for the Ford Taurus X and 4 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Celica.

Ford Taurus X g/100m

Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 5.2 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2009 5.9 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 4.7 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Taurus X Ford Taurus X 2008 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 28 10 62 70 5.2  
2009 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat lead none 10 25 10 55 65 5.9  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 flat lead light 0 0 36 64 80 4.7  
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 flat light light 2 7 21 70 69 5.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Taurus X fuel economy data.

Toyota Celica g/100m

Toyota Celica Toyota Celica 2002 2.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Toyota Celica Toyota Celica 2002 3.1 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Toyota Celica Toyota Celica 2002 2.8 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2002 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 0 75 75 2.9  
2002 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 mtns lead light 0 0 0 100 80 3.1  
2002 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 3 18 80 65 2.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Celica fuel economy data.

Ford Taurus X vs. Toyota Celica Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Taurus X and Toyota Celica's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Toyota models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Taurus X

Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 For an AWD beast, 25.6 miles per US gallon on the highway (6 hr run) into ski country, on snow tires, is pretty darned good at 70 mph. see full Ford Taurus X review
Ford Taurus X Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Wagon 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD		 In town we regularly got 15-16 mpg, and we rarely cracked 22 mpg on the highway. This was consistent with the 15/22 EPA ratings. see full Ford Taurus X review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Celica

Toyota Celica Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2002 2dr Hatch 140-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Average 33 on the highway going 80+ mph and 30 in the city on regular gas. see full Toyota Celica review
2001 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 get 35-38mpg in summer, and 32+ in rainy winter see full Toyota Celica review