We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Taurus vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 268 fuel economy reports for the Ford Taurus and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Ford Taurus km/L

Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2016 66.8 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2015 52.6 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2014 65.3 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2013 45.8 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2013 52.5 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2012 57.2 MPG Highway Percentage 67 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2011 43.3 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2011 55.0 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2011 42.8 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2010 49.9 MPG Highway Percentage 46 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2010 53.5 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2010 40.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2009 52.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2008 54.7 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2008 36.4 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2007 54.7 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2006 52.2 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2005 51.7 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2005 56.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2005 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 67 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2004 54.6 MPG Highway Percentage 52 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2004 48.2 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2003 49.9 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2003 55.5 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2002 41.5 MPG Highway Percentage 61 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2001 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2001 50.6 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2000 56.5 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Ford Taurus Ford Taurus 2000 37.7 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2016 4dr Sedan 288-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 0 0 13 88 70 66.8  
2015 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 0 0 26 74 70 52.6  
2014 4dr Sedan 288-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 0 5 25 70 75 65.3  
2013 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 20 10 50 20 60 45.8  
2013 4dr Sedan 288-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat lead light 3 68 4 27 70 52.5  
2012 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 0 10 24 67 66 57.2  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light light 3 5 22 70 74 43.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills light light 5 6 26 64 71 55.0  
2011 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 20 0 27 53 62 42.8  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 9 16 29 46 68 49.9  
2010 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 11 19 34 36 66 53.5  
2010 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat light none 13 18 20 48 77 40.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
hills med hvy 20 40 0 40 68 52.5  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 6 18 29 47 66 54.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
flat light light 41 31 11 17 100 36.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 153-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 18 18 40 25 70 54.7  
2006 4dr Sedan 153-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 6 19 31 43 69 52.2  
2005 4dr Wagon 153-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 10 10 70 10 60 51.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 0 40 30 30 60 56.9  
2005 4dr Sedan 153-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
hills light light 7 15 11 67 85 21.7  
2004 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 12 19 17 52 63 54.6  
2004 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
hills light none 15 0 55 30 75 48.2  
2003 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 11 13 23 53 75 49.9  
2003 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
hills light none 11 6 1 82 65 55.5  
2002 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 2 11 26 61 78 41.5  
2001 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 17 9 26 49 65 49.4  
2001 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
hills light none 5 10 55 30 65 50.6  
2000 4dr Wagon 200-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light hvy 0 0 10 90 70 56.5  
2000 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 8 21 15 56 81 37.7  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Taurus fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer km/L

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 50.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 44.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 48.5 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 68.8 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 62.1 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 47.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 60.4 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 13.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 59.6 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 55.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 60.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 41.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 65.4 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 35.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 40.0 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 30.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 76.2 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 51.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 55.3 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 49.6 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 78.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 51.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 55.8 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 63.5 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 61.7 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 66.9 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 50.0  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 44.7  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 48.5  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 68.8  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 62.1  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 47.0  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 9.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 60.4  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 13.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 59.6  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 11.8  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 55.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 60.8  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 41.4  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 65.4  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 22.6  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 35.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 40.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 30.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 76.2  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 51.0  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 55.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 49.6  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 78.6  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 49.4  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 51.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 9.4  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 55.8  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 63.5  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 61.7  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 66.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Ford Taurus vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Taurus and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Mitsubishi models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Taurus

Ford Taurus Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
With 28 to 30 mpg on the highway with a vacation load of luggage, food and other equipment she takes to the road with ease and comfort I never had in any car I previously owned. Mileage is close to the intermediate size Buick I used to drive but this car is much more comfortable and worth the mileage difference. see full Ford Taurus review
2011 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
With 28 to 30 mpg on the highway with a vacation load of luggage, food and other equipment she takes to the road with ease and comfort I never had in any car I previously owned. Mileage is close to the intermediate size Buick I used to drive but this car is much more comfortable and worth the mileage difference. see full Ford Taurus review
2010 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Very respectable mileage for a heavy, stylish car. see full Ford Taurus review
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
Able to get 30 mpg at 70 mph with a/c on and on the interstate. see full Ford Taurus review
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
Good mileage for a large car. 29 to 32 Highway. see full Ford Taurus review
2005 4dr Sedan 153-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
For a Large Car 30mpg on a 12 hour road trip is outstanding. see full Ford Taurus review
2004 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
Seems like they should get respectable MPG. see full Ford Taurus review
Ford Taurus Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
My average MPG is about 24 right now. It does better on the highway and not as well around town. I do not drive it hard. I am using (per Ford) Regular 87 in it and it seems fine. I ran one tank of 93 Premium and did not notice a difference in performance or mileage. see full Ford Taurus review
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic FWD
It's got a 20 gallon tank and I basically never see 400 miles on the trip counter. 20mpg in mixed use (almost 40 mile round trip commute) has been something to get used to after living with a 4-cylinderMazda 6. In addition, when I hit 1/4 tank on the gas gauge, the range computer plummets to the point that I start planning a fuel stop within 50 miles of the 1/4 tank mark. I don't know if this is unique to my car or not. see full Ford Taurus review
2005 4dr Wagon 153-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
Only getting about 4-500 km per tank of gas see full Ford Taurus review
2002 4dr Wagon 200-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
22 or 23 MPG at best on the highway is mediocre but not terrible given the size and 24V V6. see full Ford Taurus review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review