We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Transit Connect vs. Honda Ridgeline MPG

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 275 fuel economy reports for the Honda Ridgeline.

Ford Transit Connect MPG

Ford Transit Connect Ford Transit Connect 2013 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 0 5 60 35 65 24.8  

Return to top

Honda Ridgeline MPG

Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2019 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2017 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2014 18.2 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2011 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2010 17.9 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2009 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2008 17.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2007 17.2 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Honda Ridgeline Honda Ridgeline 2006 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 71 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2019 4dr SUT 280-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
flat med light 0 0 0 100 75 27.0  
2017 4dr SUT 280-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed automatic AWD
flat light light 1 14 3 82 65 21.3  
2014 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
hills med none 5 10 10 75 60 18.2  
2011 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
mtns med light 28 31 0 41 75 17.0  
2010 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat med none 4 16 37 43 70 17.9  
2009 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat med light 5 11 11 74 79 20.3  
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat light none 0 11 41 48 71 17.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat light none 9 9 39 43 67 17.2  
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat med light 6 9 14 71 68 20.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Honda Ridgeline fuel economy data.

Ford Transit Connect vs. Honda Ridgeline MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Transit Connect and Honda Ridgeline's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Honda models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Honda Ridgeline

Honda Ridgeline Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
17-18 around town, 20+ on the highway on regular fuel. see full Honda Ridgeline review
Honda Ridgeline Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
Like many have said, should get better gas mileage for its smaller size. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2009 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
Should get better mileage for a smaller truck. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
16-18 MPG from a Honda is dismal. I averaged 20 MPG in my 2004 4x4 Ranger super cab. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
My records show the published manufacturer figures are excellent but competators seem to be doing a bit better see full Honda Ridgeline review
2008 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
It does not have a fuel advantage for being a unit body. I am getting only a 1 mpg combined city/highway economy improvment over my Dodge Ram 3500 Megacab Diesel 4x4(which has been sold to buy this Honda.) see full Honda Ridgeline review
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
I typically get 18 mpg in suburban driving, and 22 mpg at a steady highway cruise. Not awful, but I would like better mileage from a 3.5L V-6. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
13-15mpg around town. 18mpg on the road. Knew this going in though and I still LOVE this truck! see full Honda Ridgeline review
2007 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
The fuel economy is no better than other V6 trucks, and barely better than some V8 trucks. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
I would like to be 20+ mpg but in this category the Ridgeline is a "clunker" at about 15-18 mpg. see full Honda Ridgeline review
2006 4dr SUT 247-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
i expected better- i get 17-18 over all. with a 1500 4wd chevy w/5.3 liter i got the same or better with much more power. see full Honda Ridgeline review