We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Transit Connect vs. Kia Sedona MPG

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 86 fuel economy reports for the Kia Sedona.

Ford Transit Connect MPG

Ford Transit Connect Ford Transit Connect 2013 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 0 5 60 35 65 24.8  

Return to top

Kia Sedona MPG

Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2014 21.7 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2009 19.2 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2007 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2007 23.9 MPG Highway Percentage 73 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2006 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2005 22.4 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2004 18.6 MPG Highway Percentage 6 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2003 17.1 MPG Highway Percentage 67 percent Kia Sedona Kia Sedona 2002 17.9 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Minivan, ext. 269-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat v.lt light 0 7 0 93 65 21.7  
2009 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 9 20 6 65 81 19.2  
2007 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 5 9 39 47 68 20.3  
2007 4dr Minivan 250-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 0 5 22 73 67 23.9  
2006 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 4 17 19 60 77 20.3  
2005 4dr Minivan, ext. 195-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 20 7 33 40 60 22.4  
2004 4dr Minivan, ext. 195-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 1 80 13 6 63 18.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2003 4dr Minivan, ext. 195-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 5 9 20 67 63 17.1  
2002 4dr Minivan, ext. 195-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 1 23 34 42 74 17.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Kia Sedona fuel economy data.

Ford Transit Connect vs. Kia Sedona MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Transit Connect and Kia Sedona's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Kia models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Kia Sedona

Kia Sedona Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
2008 Most Kia Sedonas earn EPA ratings of 18 mpg city, 24 mpg highway. This is just a bit worse than the Sienna's 18/25, but well below the Odyssey's 19/28, at least on the highway. But the SX Limited, with more heft and different tires, rates only 17/22, the lowest of any current minivan. In my real-world sub-freezing driving the trip computer reported averages between 16 and 21 in the suburbs (depending on the number of stops, amount of traffic, whether the engine was already warmed up, etc.) and about 25 on the highway. The Sienna managed about the same--but with all-wheel-drive. A front-wheel-drive Toyota should do a little better. In somewhat warmer weather, the Odyssey managed as high as 25 on my standard home-to-school run. see full Kia Sedona review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Kia Sedona

Kia Sedona Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 0 poor compared to honda or toyota see full Kia Sedona review
Kia Sedona Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
18mpg in the city - typical for minivans but not good see full Kia Sedona review
2008 4dr Minivan, ext. 250-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Er, economy is not the right word to use here. It gulps fuel, even when driven fairly carefully. see full Kia Sedona review
2006 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Other mini-van that we considered had a better fuel economy rating [but really not by much]. see full Kia Sedona review
2006 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
The 2006 Sedona gets about 1-2 MPG less in real life MPG reports, compared to its Toyota and Honda competition see full Kia Sedona review
2006 4dr Minivan, ext. 244-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Much lower than EPA advertised. see full Kia Sedona review
2004 4dr Minivan, ext. 195-horsepower 3.5L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
Roughly 15 mpg see full Kia Sedona review