We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Transit Connect vs. Nissan cube Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 46 fuel economy reports for the Nissan cube.

Ford Transit Connect g/100m

Ford Transit Connect Ford Transit Connect 2013 4.0 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2013 4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 0 5 60 35 65 4.0  

Return to top

Nissan cube g/100m

Nissan cube Nissan cube 2010 3.1 MPG Highway Percentage 73 percent Nissan cube Nissan cube 2010 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 84 percent Nissan cube Nissan cube 2009 3.3 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan cube Nissan cube 2009 3.3 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
flat light none 1 6 20 73 65 3.1  
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat med hvy 8 0 8 84 75 3.5  
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
flat med light 8 26 18 48 66 3.3  
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat med light 3 12 33 51 68 3.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan cube fuel economy data.

Ford Transit Connect vs. Nissan cube Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Transit Connect and Nissan cube's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Nissan models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan cube

Nissan cube Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Does quite well for a car being aerodynamically shaped like a toaster. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
WE GET 30 MPG AROUND TOWN. GETS UP TO 42 ON HIGHWAY. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
For me, it is better than I had expected. It is rated at 28 city, and 30 highway. I have yet to get less than 32 mpg on a tankfull. That is mostly suburb driving near Atlanta. I am not a heavy footed driver though. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Averaging a tad under 30 city and hiway, with an auto. Thats pretty good. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
I think the milage is pretty good for it not being a super-high milage (yet smaller) economy car. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
CVT FWD
Excellent around-city economy. see full Nissan cube review
2009 4dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.8L I4
6-speed manual FWD
Approximately 30mpg is good and meets my personal "green" threshold. see full Nissan cube review