MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Transit Connect vs. Volvo C30 MPG

Chart is based on 1 fuel economy reports for the Ford Transit Connect and 78 fuel economy reports for the Volvo C30.

Ford Transit Connect MPG

Ford Transit Connect Ford Transit Connect 2013 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 4dr Minivan 136-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 0 5 60 35 65 24.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Transit Connect fuel economy data.

Volvo C30 MPG

Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2013 29.0 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2011 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2011 16.8 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2009 26.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2009 26.7 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2009 30.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2009 41.7 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2009 27.5 MPG Highway Percentage 96 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2008 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Volvo C30 Volvo C30 2008 25.3 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 100 0 0 29.0  
2011 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 18 27 12 43 97 25.5  
2011 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 30 15 45 10 70 16.8  
2009 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 3 14 44 40 69 26.0  
2009 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 12 20 5 64 68 26.7  
2009 2dr Hatch turbocharged 177hp 2.4L I5 Diesel
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med hvy 0 25 75 0 0 30.5  
2009 2dr Hatch turbocharged 109hp 1.6L I4 Diesel
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light light 0 0 35 65 60 41.7  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 2dr Hatch 99-horsepower 1.6L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 1 1 2 96 65 27.5  
2008 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 7 26 22 45 68 26.4  
2008 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 8 21 15 57 70 25.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volvo C30 fuel economy data.

Ford Transit Connect vs. Volvo C30 MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Transit Connect and Volvo C30's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Volvo models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

Ford Transit Connect Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 With less size and weight and a smaller engine, the Ford Transit Connect does get better fuel economy than a conventional minivan...but its advantage isn't large. The Ford's EPA ratings--20 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--best the Toyota Sienna's by two in the city and three on the highway. But the Honda Odyssey is rated 19/28. On the other hand, the much smaller, much lighter Mazda5 only managed 21/28. What's going on? Well, the Ford is very tall, so even though it's narrower it's pushing nearly as much frontal area through the air. This especially matters on the highway. Also, the Transit Connect is not much lighter, 3,979 lbs. to the Sienna's 4,310. Two tons is a lot of weight for a 2.5-liter four-cylinder to motivate. In the real-world, a light foot in the suburbs could nudge the trip computer average to 27 (even 30 on one trip). The Odyssey's trip computer reported numbers about five below these, while the Sienna struggled to crack 20. Push the Transit Connect a bit harder, and the trip computer average dropped to about 23, still good for a vehicle its size. But was the trip computer accurate? The gas gauge needle fell much faster than these numbers suggested it should have. On a 70-mph highway, even the trip computer numbers were short of the EPA rating, about 25. The big minivans can do this well. Blame the Ford's frontal area. The Transit Connect's fuel economy advantage is chiefly in urban and suburban driving. see full Ford Transit Connect review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volvo C30

Volvo C30 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
5-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 The fuel economy when drive correctly provides almost 30 MPG for Hwy driving. see full Volvo C30 review
Volvo C30 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 It is not as good as I would like. see full Volvo C30 review
2008 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 The MPG is not terrible(22-24 combined mpg). But for a small car, most people would expect 30+mpg(28 at the least). see full Volvo C30 review
2008 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5
6-speed manual FWD		 Ill admit that when I drove the C30 I was driving fast. I rented it for a weekend to see if I wanted to buy it or not. And I went thru an entire tank in less than 200 miles. see full Volvo C30 review