| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Honda CR-V and 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Honda CR-V | BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,619 mm | 2,921 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,554 mm | 4,826 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,819 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,537 kg | 1,776 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 58 L | 60 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 973 mm | 7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 996 mm | -18 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,062 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,011 L | 518 L | -517 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 35.7 | 521 L | -485.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,064 L | 1,600 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda CR-V
| 2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
I sometimes have elderly passengers. They do not have to squirm to get in or do calesthenics to get out. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
The caravan style arm rests are ugly but extremely comfortable. see full Honda CR-V review |
| 2010 Honda CR-V Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 180-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic AWD |
Could not find a comfortable position, even with a power seat. see full Honda CR-V review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
| 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Though the latest 3-Series has a much roomier back seat than its predecessors, many people still find it insufficient for their needs, and step up to a midsize sedan or wagon such as the 5-Series or E-Class. Well, most of the 3-Series Gran Turismo's wheelbase stretch was put towards rear seat legroom, bumping it from 35.0 to 37.9 inches. Though a larger car, the E-Class has nearly four inches less total legroom--barely more than the 3 wagon, in fact. (But with a more comfortably positioned rear seat than the 3 wagon.) What the specs don't tell you is that the 3 GT's rear seat cushion, since it is positioned much higher than that in the wagons, provides better thigh support and a much more open view forward. To top it off, the 3 GT's rear seat back reclines. Here again, though, the E-Class wagon has a trick bonus: a rear-facing third-row seat. Though there's not enough headroom back there for anyone over 5-4, the seat is well-padded. If you want to seat seven in a pinch, the E-Class wagon is your only option with a sedan-like driving position (aside from the Tesla Model S). Update: this review originally stated that the 3GT has much more shoulder room than the regular 3-Series, and about as much as the E-Class. But it seems that the initial specs were inaccurate. The latest specs suggest shoulder room in the 3GT is about the same as that in the regular 3-Series. Its interior does feel significantly roomier, though, so the initial specs could yet provide the more accurate set. see full BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
