| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Honda Pilot and 2011 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2011 | |
| Model | Honda Pilot | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 111.0 in | 102.4 in | 8.6 in |
| Length | 194.5 in | 171.9 in | 22.6 in |
| Width | 78.6 in | 69.5 in | 9.1 in |
| Height | 69.8 in | 61.4 in | 8.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4054 lb. | 2865 lb. | 1189 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.5 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 6.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.1 in | 40.5 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 62.0 in | 53.3 in | 8.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 52.3 in | 6.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 41.6 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.2 in | 39.3 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 62.0 in | 52.6 in | 9.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.3 in | 43.7 in | 13.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 36.2 in | 2.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 38.9 in | 0.0 in | 38.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.6 in | 0.0 in | 57.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 44.6 in | 0.0 in | 44.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 31.9 in | 0.0 in | 31.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 111.2 in (over 3 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 33.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.5 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | -3.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 46.8 ft3 | 19.8 | 27 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 83.9 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | 22.4 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
| 2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Matrix
| 2011 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
