| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Honda Pilot and 2011 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2011 | |
| Model | Honda Pilot | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,940 mm | 4,366 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,996 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,773 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,839 kg | 1,300 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 74 L | 50 L | 24 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,575 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,021 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,575 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,455 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 919 mm | 56 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 988 mm | 0 mm | 988 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,463 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,133 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 810 mm | 0 mm | 810 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 467 L | 561 L | -94 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,325 L | 19.8 | -18.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,376 L | 1,741 L | 1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
| 2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Matrix
| 2011 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Honda models.
