Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
Model | Honda Ridgeline | Toyota Sienna | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 250 hp@5700 247 lb-ft@4300 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 266 hp@6200 245 lb-ft@4700 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 122.0 in | 119.3 in | 2.7 in |
Length | 206.8 in | 200.2 in | 6.6 in |
Width | 76.3 in | 78.1 in | -1.8 in |
Height | 70.3 in | 68.9 in | 1.4 in |
Curb Weight | 4503 lb. | 4590 lb. | -87 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 20.0 gal. | 2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 41.0 in | -0.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.2 in | 65.0 in | -1.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.6 in | 58.6 in | -1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.8 in | 40.5 in | 0.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 39.7 in | -0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 62.6 in | 64.6 in | -2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 66.1 in | -8.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 37.6 in | -1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.3 in | -38.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 61.1 in | -61.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.3 in | -50.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
Total Legroom | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 114.4 in (over 3 rows) | -37.2 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 39.1 ft3 | -39.1 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 0.0 | 87.1 ft3 | -87.1 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0.0 | 150.0 ft3 | -150 |
2011 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.