Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
Model | Honda Ridgeline | Toyota Sienna | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 186 kW@5700 335 Nm@4300 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 198 kW@6200 332 Nm@4700 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUT | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,099 mm | 3,030 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,253 mm | 5,085 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,938 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,786 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,043 kg | 2,082 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 83 L | 76 L | 7 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,605 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,463 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 1,008 mm | 992 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,590 mm | 1,641 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 955 mm | -30 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,552 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,906 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 1,107 L | -1 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 0.0 | 2,466 L | -2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0.0 | 4,248 L | -4 |
2011 Honda Ridgeline Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I too love that the rearseats can both flip up. This offers me alot of rear floor space to haul my music gear instead of laying it out on the rear bed area. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
2010 | 4dr SUT 250-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
The interior is the Ridgelines stronges point. Comfortable front and back and a feeling a space. The lack of transmission tunnel and column mounted shifter in particular make the front cabin roomy. see full Honda Ridgeline review |
2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.