We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Hyundai Genesis vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 133 fuel economy reports for the Hyundai Genesis and 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer.

Hyundai Genesis L/100km

Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2015 8.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2015 12.3 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2015 7.7 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2012 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 84 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2012 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 61 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2011 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2010 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2010 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2009 11.6 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2009 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2015 4dr Sedan 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills med none 3 3 0 95 73 8.0  
2015 4dr Sedan 311-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 9 37 28 27 79 12.3  
2015 4dr Sedan 311-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 0 12 8 80 70 7.7  
2012 4dr Sedan 429-horsepower 5.0L V8
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 1 10 4 84 74 9.3  
2012 4dr Sedan 333-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 2 5 33 61 73 9.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 8 6 31 55 76 10.4  
2010 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med hvy 5 9 22 64 70 10.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med hvy 4 16 39 42 77 11.3  
2009 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 11 21 34 34 73 11.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 9 19 22 51 79 10.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Hyundai Genesis fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer L/100km

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 12.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 7.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 10.1 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 7.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 7.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.2 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 7.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 10.0 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 8.3 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 11.1  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 12.4  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 11.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 8.1  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 8.9  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 11.8  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 11.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 9.3  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 7.5  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 9.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD
flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 10.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 9.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 8.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 7.9  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 11.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD
hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 8.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 9.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 7.3  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 10.9  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 10.2  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 9.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 7.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD
flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 11.2  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 10.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 10.6  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 10.0  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 8.7  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 9.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 8.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Hyundai Genesis vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Hyundai Genesis and Mitsubishi Lancer's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Hyundai models and Mitsubishi models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Hyundai Genesis

Hyundai Genesis Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
2009 While competitors have been switching to relatively small turbocharged engines, the Genesis continues to rely on larger normally aspirated ones. Even the base car's 3.8-liter V6 is nearly twice the size of the Audi's turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine. Also, Hyundai doesn't yet offer automatic stop/start. The most significant impact: the Genesis gets much worse fuel economy. With two-wheel drive, the A6 2.0T scored 24 mpg city, 35 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, the Genesis 3.8 only 18/29. Add all-wheel drive, and the Audi's ratings fall to 22/32, the Hyundai's to 16/25, not good. Hyundai has developed a new turbocharged 3.3-liter V6 to replace the 3.8, but it isn't clear how soon this new, more efficient and more powerful engine will be available in the Genesis G80. It won't be available when the car arrives this summer, so most likely the 2018 model year. According to the trip computer, my real-world fuel economy was well above the EPA figures. Only when I drove the Genesis fairly aggressively did the trip computer average fall below 20 mpg. On my usual suburban route it averaged around 23 mpg, and on a 70-mph highway it averaged about 30 mpg. The former was still a few mpg short of the Audi, but the latter was at least as good. If the trip computer is accurate, the fuel economy of the Genesis isn't nearly as dismal as the EPA ratings indicate. see full Hyundai Genesis review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Hyundai Genesis

Hyundai Genesis Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Sedan 333-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD
This is my second Genesis. First one was a 2010 4.6L and this has the 6 cyl and it is nearly as quick but gets better fuel mileage. I get in the high 20's on the highway. Used to get 25 to 27 in the 8cyl. This 2012 has an 8 speed transmission compared to the 2010's 7 speed. see full Hyundai Genesis review
2010 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
about average for a V8, nothing special see full Hyundai Genesis review
Hyundai Genesis Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
I would like the economy to be higher... 20-28 range see full Hyundai Genesis review
2009 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
With all the added technology, I would have expected better mileage. I average slightly less than 20 MPH and that is the same as an older heavier STS without the latest and greatest engine management features. see full Hyundai Genesis review
2009 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Others say they are getting the 18 to 24 MPG claimed. I find that when I do 80% "suburban driving" (strip malls, lights, in/out of car, etc), I get 16 at best. When I am doing 80 on the highway w/ cruise control, I get 23-26. see full Hyundai Genesis review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD
22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review