Land Rover LR4 (2013) vs. Ford Mustang (2003) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Land Rover LR4 and 2003 Ford Mustang specs.
2013 Land Rover LR4 and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications
Model Year |
2013 |
2003 |
|
Model |
Land Rover LR4 |
Ford Mustang |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover LR4
2012 |
4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Perfect family car. fold down seats that, because of the raised headline, are usable by adults. large cargo area, 3rd row a/c....
see full Land Rover LR4 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang
2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2003 |
2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats.
But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker.
see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Land Rover models.