Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2003

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) vs. Ford Mustang (2003) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2003 Ford Mustang specs.

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2013 2003  
Model Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang

2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review
2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.