MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Lexus CT vs. Land Rover LR3 Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 15 fuel economy reports for the Lexus CT and 73 fuel economy reports for the Land Rover LR3.

Lexus CT g/100m

Lexus CT Lexus CT 2012 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Lexus CT Lexus CT 2011 4.9 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2012 4dr Hatch 98-horsepower 1.8L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD		 hills med light 15 14 21 50 79 4.9  
2011 4dr Hatch 98-horsepower 1.8L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD		 flat light none 12 11 38 40 69 4.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Lexus CT fuel economy data.

Land Rover LR3 g/100m

Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2008 25.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2008 6.5 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2007 25.7 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2007 5.8 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2006 25.2 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2006 13.1 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2006 15.8 MPG Highway Percentage 11 percent Land Rover LR3 Land Rover LR3 2005 16.6 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2008 4dr SUV turbocharged 190hp 2.7L V6 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat light light 8 20 22 50 111 25.0  
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 hills light light 11 19 20 50 66 6.5  
2007 4dr SUV turbocharged 190hp 2.7L V6 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 hills lead hvy 5 10 25 60 120 25.7  
2007 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 hills light light 1 15 43 42 68 5.8  
2006 4dr SUV turbocharged 190hp 2.7L V6 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 hills light light 3 18 32 47 107 25.2  
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat light light 10 38 17 36 73 13.1  
2006 4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat light none 16 28 45 11 78 15.8  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 flat med light 6 20 30 44 86 16.6  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Land Rover LR3 fuel economy data.

Lexus CT vs. Land Rover LR3 Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Lexus CT and Land Rover LR3's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Lexus models and Land Rover models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Lexus CT

Lexus CT Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 4dr Hatch 98-horsepower 1.8L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD		 It's a Prius at heart. Not much else I have to say there. The Lexus luxury (Lex-ury?) added some weight to the frame, but a 42/42 MPG rating certainly will save on gas. see full Lexus CT review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Land Rover LR3

Land Rover LR3 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 20MPG AND 6000LBS NOT BAD see full Land Rover LR3 review
Land Rover LR3 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 12-14 mpg sucks see full Land Rover LR3 review
2008 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 12 miles to a gallon, whats to like? see full Land Rover LR3 review
2006 4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 13-14 MPG is not great (V6 engine), the truck is definitely too heavy. see full Land Rover LR3 review
2006 4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 It sucks. see full Land Rover LR3 review
2006 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 13 mpg city. see full Land Rover LR3 review
2006 4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 My V6 is returning 16L/100km (14 MPG) in mostly city driving. Not a good number. see full Land Rover LR3 review
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 12 miles to the gallon. Say goodbye to that new pair of shoes you've been eyeing- the gas tank just ate them. see full Land Rover LR3 review
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 typical 11 MPG city see full Land Rover LR3 review
2005 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range		 The fuel economy is terrible. But it is hard to improve the mpg of such a functional and large vehicle. The car would be improved by greater use of aluminum, shutting down cylinders at high speed, and a hybrid drivetrain, even a mild start/stop one. see full Land Rover LR3 review