MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mazda CX-9 vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 335 fuel economy reports for the Mazda CX-9 and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Mazda CX-9 km/L

Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2019 59.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2017 46.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2013 49.5 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2012 47.6 MPG Highway Percentage 97 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2012 38.8 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2011 34.6 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2011 45.3 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2010 43.2 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2010 34.0 MPG Highway Percentage 29 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2009 44.0 MPG Highway Percentage 14 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2009 42.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2008 46.3 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2008 43.1 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2007 46.4 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2007 42.4 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2019 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 0 50 0 50 50 59.3  
2017 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 5 5 50 40 75 46.3  
2013 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 0 95 0 5 70 49.5  
2012 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 hills med none 0 0 4 97 78 47.6  
2012 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 0 5 80 15 70 38.8  
2011 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 44 20 15 21 64 34.6  
2011 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 0 10 35 55 63 45.3  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 33 17 13 37 63 43.2  
2010 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills light none 6 48 17 29 73 34.0  
2009 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 hills med light 5 19 61 14 62 44.0  
2009 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 7 26 18 50 66 42.1  
2008 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med light 4 15 13 68 72 46.3  
2008 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light light 6 15 25 54 70 43.1  
2007 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 13 19 25 43 67 46.4  
2007 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 10 20 16 54 69 42.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mazda CX-9 fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos km/L

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 70.6 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 72.9 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 66.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 67.7 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 63.7 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 118.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 55.9 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 49.4  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 70.6  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 72.9  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 66.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 67.7  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 63.7  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 118.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 55.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Mazda CX-9 vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mazda CX-9 and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models and Volkswagen models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mazda CX-9

Mazda CX-9 Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 avg 18mpg for a large vehicle see full Mazda CX-9 review
2007 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 Uses regular gas. I have been getting about 19-20 MPG with mostly rush hour highway driving. see full Mazda CX-9 review
Mazda CX-9 Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 EPA ratings of 17/24, but I've averaged barely 18 overall in my first 1200 miles...hoping for a slight improvement after break-in. UPDATE- as of 02/11/2013, I am averaging 20-21mpg overall with 4200 miles on the clock. On a recent 380-mile interstate trip, I managed 22.8mpg with the cruise set at 80mph. see full Mazda CX-9 review
2009 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 A bit lower than the competitions see full Mazda CX-9 review
2009 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 in city gives about 13-14 mpg. Highway is still good. I can get 21-23 mpg on highways see full Mazda CX-9 review
2008 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 The AWD feature does use more gas than a FWD vehicle. Averages about 17-18 city and about 20 highway. see full Mazda CX-9 review
2008 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 The fuel economy was lower than for the Murano. The plus is that it uses regular. see full Mazda CX-9 review
2008 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 too low see full Mazda CX-9 review
2007 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Could be better. I have seen 24mpg as a high on the highway....but usually closer to 21-22. Around town is 17-18. see full Mazda CX-9 review
2007 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 Around town mileage is low. see full Mazda CX-9 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review