Toyota Camry (2008) vs. GMC Terrain (2019) Specs

vs.

◆

2008 Toyota Camry and 2019 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year	2008	2019
Model	Toyota Camry	GMC Terrain
Engine	3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 268 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700	turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 252 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@2500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	9-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	FWD	FWD
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	109.3 in	107.3 in	2 in
Length	189.2 in	182.3 in	6.9 in
Width	71.1 in	72.4 in	-1.3 in
Height	57.9 in	65.4 in	-7.5 in
Curb Weight	3461 lb.	3563 lb.	-102 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.5 gal.	14.9 gal.	3.6 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.8 in	40.0 in	-1.2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	57.8 in	57.2 in	0.6 in
Hip Room, Row 1	54.6 in	54.4 in	0.2 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.7 in	40.9 in	0.8 in
Headroom, Row 2	37.8 in	38.5 in	-0.7 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	56.9 in	55.6 in	1.3 in
Hip Room, Row 2	53.9 in	51.8 in	2.1 in
Legroom, Row 2	38.3 in	39.7 in	-1.4 in
Total Legroom	80 in (over 2 rows)	80.6 in (over 2 rows)	-0.6 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	15.0 ft³	29.6 ft³	-14.6 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	15.0 ft³	63.3 ft³	-48.3 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Toyota Camry

2008 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review
2008	4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Big and comfy. see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Big and comfy. see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Rear seat is large and lots of leg room. Nice feature is the center armrest, which many cars in this price range do not have. see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD	Very big seat area for a big person. Easy to get in and out of. see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	I have arthritis and it is great to have a seat that i can lower and slide way back. Not just great - it was important in the purchase decision. . see full Toyota Camry review

2008 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review
2008	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	These seats seem to have been designed for someone 250 pounds. Wide, flat, and no proper support for your back. While this has a lumbar support for the driver, the poor seat design makes this uncomfortable for long trips. see full Toyota Camry review
2007	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	It could not seat three adults, while the Ford could easily seat three large people, and give them limo-like legroom. see full Toyota Camry review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain

2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2018	The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.