| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota RAV4 and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,783 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,524 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 61 L | -1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 884 mm | -883 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 777 mm | 196 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 0 mm | 945 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 0 mm | 762 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 382 L | -34 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 13.5 | -12.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 13.5 | -11.5 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota RAV4
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
