We are 106,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

2005 Volvo S60 Pros and Cons at TrueDelta: Owner Pros and Cons by snowcoast



Sign in or join to like this review.

Reviewed: 2005 Volvo S60

4dr Sedan turbocharged 208hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD

Why the 2005 Volvo S60?

Reliability & durability

Have owned for 4.5 years. Wife and I purchased based on experiences of 2 family members who had good experiences. We have been stranded once (in driveway) due to faulty shift lock mechanism, otherwise have put 151,000 essentially pain-free KM on this.


Handles better than you initially expect. This is a car you get used to. Feels heavy at first, and can feel sluggish at low speeds - however you quickly learn these cars are as thrilling to drive at upper-end speeds as anything in the segment.

Materials & workmanship

Apart from poorly designed front-end our S60 2.5T has been bulletproof. All major items appear to be built to last. Of better quality than the Lexus RX I used to own - which I feel is high praise.

Why Not the 2005 Volvo S60?

Rear seat room & comfort

Minimal rear seat leg room. Our kids are 9 & 8 - we are having to look for a replacement car as they are getting too big for this one. To offset the front seats are as comfortable as I have experienced in a car. Now considering an S80 or XC70.


In my experience brakes and tires wear prematurally as compared to other vehicles I have owned. Car is hypermiled - not driven like an F1 car. At best I seem to get 30-40 km out of tires rated for 80 km. Notice brakes becoming less effective after 25km.

Insurance cost

Insurance cost is nearly double what we pay on our 6 year newer Venza. Cost of ownership is consistent with other European manufacturers.

Return to top

Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own thoughts.

Return to top

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Volvo models.
Website Security Test