We are 107,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

2008 Subaru Outback Reviews at TrueDelta: I swallowed the AWD / reliability / safety marketing pill and paid for it dearly... by kjerram

Member6402

1

Sign in or join to like this review.

Introduction

I bought a 2008 Outback 2.5 PZEV 5-speed wagon with 95,000 miles in December 2013 for $12,500. Despite coming from a dealer and having a fairly complete maintenance history and new timing belt at the time of purchase, the vehicle needed a phenomenal amount of attention in the ~2 years I owned it. New wheel bearings on all corners every 40,000 miles (if lucky), CV shaft boots cracking because of proximity to exhaust, electrical issues with the airbag warning lights, headlight and radio failures related to tailgate wiring issues, routine exhaust leaks, engine whistling noises of undiagnosable origin, three consecutive failures of OEM Subaru clutch release bearings (finally fixed with aftermarket kit), and a seriously rust-prone body construction even with frequent washing and waxing. Not to mention fuel economy several MPG below the stated performance, especially after the several emissions-related ECU reflashes the dealer required!

Reviewed: 2008 Subaru Outback

4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD

2008 Subaru Outback Horror Story

Blue... and rust.

Conclusion

This car cost me ~$5000 in repairs in 27 months, though I did a tremendous amount of research on the Subaru forums and used independent Subaru-experienced mechanics whenever possible. After the last two recalls (catalytic converter and airbag) that required interaction with the dealer, I decided give up on this thing and was lucky to get $6500 for it. Unfortunately, that means I lost $11,000 in two years. I admit I swallowed the AWD / reliability / safety marketing pill and it cost me a tremendous amount of money, aggravation, and peace of mind. Now looking at Subaru's latest fear-based advertising featuring a mom and her kid getting into an accident, I am even happier to be done with this company. Best wishes to anyone who can stomach a long-term relationship with one of these 2005-2009 generation Outbacks.

Return to top

Response from pquigs

11:52 am April 1, 2016

Response from Anonymous1

10:27 pm June 5, 2016

Response from mkaresh

11:23 am June 6, 2016

In TrueDelta's reliability stats the 2005-2009 Outbacks have been much more troublesome than the 2010 and up.

0

Link to this reponse

Response from Krivka

7:56 pm November 25, 2016

I have a 2007 Outback that I bought in 2012. It had about 45k when I bought it and so far this is what I have had to have done. Window off the track; repaired for $200.00, shifter cable replaced; another $150.00, rear struts, one rear wheel bearing; $400.00.One front shaft and repair on y pipe in exhaust $260.00. I also just did the 105K timing belt with water pump job; $1150.00. So far the dreaded head gasket job has not been required. It is strangely difficult car to hate though. It gets poor mileage, but is enjoyable to drive. I just gave it to my daughter hoping that it can go a few years without the heads blowing, and if and when it does, I am going to Subaru for some relief. I now have 99k on the car. I gave another daughter my 2008 Malibu with about 120k, which had only needed brakes and tires and minor maintenance issues like a blown headlight. It is underpowered, but a great ride and so far bullet proof. No rust on any of the cars despite living in Cleveland, Ohio. I would buy another Chevy, but not a Subaru and I do love that car but it does nicle and dime you. Like I said, it is strange.

0

Link to this reponse

Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own thoughts.

Return to top

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Wagons.
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.

Thanks for your interest in TrueDelta!