We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Ford Ranger vs. Toyota Camry MPG

Chart is based on 141 fuel economy reports for the Ford Ranger and 1580 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Camry.

Ford Ranger MPG

Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2021 20.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2020 24.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2011 20.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2010 20.4 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2010 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2009 13.0 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2009 26.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 16.0 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2008 19.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 14.4 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2007 17.2 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 19.4 MPG Highway Percentage 54 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 12.5 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2006 17.4 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 16.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2005 15.6 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 20.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 18.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 21.1 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 18.3 MPG Highway Percentage 84 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2004 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 19.3 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003 14.6 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 16.7 MPG Highway Percentage 82 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2002 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2001 18.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 16.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2000 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2021 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4
10-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 20 0 80 100 20.5  
2020 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed turbocharged 270hp 2.3L I4
10-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light hvy 10 40 50 0 0 24.5  
2011 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 27 13 60 68 20.4  
2010 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 10 10 10 70 100 20.4  
2010 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 9 36 0 55 75 27.0  
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med hvy 8 48 10 35 120 13.0  
2009 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 20 0 80 65 26.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 5 50 0 45 100 16.0  
2008 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 10 10 10 70 65 19.0  
2007 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 0 53 0 47 107 14.4  
2007 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 0 53 47 65 17.2  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light none 10 16 20 54 100 19.4  
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 25 35 25 15 110 12.5  
2006 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 20 10 35 35 75 17.4  
2005 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 50 20 30 60 16.7  
2005 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 148-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat light light 5 20 35 40 60 30.0  
2005 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 10 60 10 20 75 15.6  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 20 70 55 20.0  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills light light 0 0 5 95 65 18.0  
2004 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 0 20 10 70 75 21.1  
2004 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 10 30 40 20 60 27.1  
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med hvy 1 5 10 84 70 18.3  
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 9 38 20 34 69 17.0  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 5 10 5 80 60 21.3  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
hills med none 0 3 3 95 70 19.3  
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light none 0 10 25 65 65 22.6  
2003 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 143-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat light none 8 8 21 64 65 24.8  
2003 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 0 0 90 10 70 14.6  
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med light 0 18 0 82 74 16.7  
2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 146-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat v.lt none 10 10 10 70 60 22.0  
2002 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 135-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 48 35 18 75 25.5  
2001 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat light hvy 0 0 30 70 60 18.5  
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 0 0 20 80 100 16.3  
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
flat med none 100 0 0 0 0 11.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Ford Ranger fuel economy data.

Toyota Camry MPG

Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2018 38.0 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2016 45.0 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2015 32.2 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2015 30.9 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2014 34.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2013 41.6 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2012 25.9 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2012 39.2 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2011 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 21 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2011 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2011 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2011 38.0 MPG Highway Percentage 46 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2010 31.1 MPG Highway Percentage 52 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2010 34.0 MPG Highway Percentage 32 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2010 37.7 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2009 28.6 MPG Highway Percentage 86 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2009 35.5 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2009 29.8 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2008 26.1 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2008 37.4 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2008 29.0 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2008 29.7 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2007 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2007 36.8 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2007 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2007 26.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2006 28.6 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2005 27.6 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2004 25.0 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2004 20.7 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2003 19.8 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2003 30.9 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2003 30.1 MPG Highway Percentage 68 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2002 24.0 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2002 29.9 MPG Highway Percentage 61 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2001 26.1 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2001 27.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2001 26.2 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2000 21.4 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2000 27.3 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Toyota Camry Toyota Camry 2000 25.4 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2018 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 2.5L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 0 2 29 68 71 38.0  
2016 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat med light 0 10 80 10 50 45.0  
2015 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med hvy 0 0 5 95 120 32.2  
2015 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med hvy 1 8 48 43 76 30.9  
2014 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 0 30 0 70 60 34.5  
2013 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light none 1 4 25 70 64 41.6  
2012 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 1 13 40 47 74 25.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2012 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light none 2 8 55 35 67 39.2  
2011 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 16 63 0 21 70 24.0  
2011 4dr Sedan 179-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 5 32 45 18 71 24.0  
2011 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
hills med light 14 32 9 45 73 25.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 147-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light light 1 10 43 46 53 38.0  
2010 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 4 27 17 52 69 31.1  
2010 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat light none 4 4 59 32 65 34.0  
2010 4dr Sedan 147-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat v.lt none 6 8 31 55 79 37.7  
2009 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 0 1 13 86 71 28.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat med light 1 6 8 85 74 35.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 4 13 24 59 68 29.8  
2008 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 10 10 30 50 100 26.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light light 16 17 20 47 66 37.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
hills med none 0 20 13 68 78 29.0  
2008 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 2 31 19 48 85 29.7  
2007 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat med light 11 13 21 55 71 25.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
flat light light 4 17 24 56 83 36.8  
2007 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat med light 5 5 25 65 60 30.0  
2007 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 6 23 21 50 72 26.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 154-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 3 13 21 63 67 28.6  
2005 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 2 7 34 56 66 27.6  
2004 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 1 28 8 63 58 25.0  
2004 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light hvy 46 47 2 5 66 20.7  
2003 4dr Sedan 192-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 19 80 0 1 60 19.8  
2003 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 35 65 90 30.9  
2003 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light hvy 1 5 26 68 72 30.1  
2002 4dr Sedan 192-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med light 8 14 21 57 69 24.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 6 16 17 61 70 29.9  
2001 4dr Sedan 194-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light hvy 0 0 0 100 110 26.1  
2001 4dr Sedan 136-horsepower 2.2L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 15 65 20 75 27.2  
2001 4dr Sedan 136-horsepower 2.2L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light light 5 10 30 55 68 26.2  
2000 4dr Sedan 194-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 20 30 50 0 0 21.4  
2000 4dr Sedan 136-horsepower 2.2L I4
5-speed manual FWD
flat light none 5 30 30 35 65 27.3  
2000 4dr Sedan 136-horsepower 2.2L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 6 33 38 23 65 25.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Camry fuel economy data.

Ford Ranger vs. Toyota Camry MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Ford Ranger and Toyota Camry's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Ford models and Toyota models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
Could be better. Right now getting a nudge over 20mpg each tank, which is somewhat expected but could still be better. see full Ford Ranger review
2009 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
2009 4.0L 4x4 with Auto is just HORRIBLE for fuel mileage - all these trucks with the 4.0L are! Although the Ford Ranger has an excellent and proven track record for reliability and the new vehicle pricing was very competitive, I could have purchased a larger more expensive truck with a V8 and more features and by this time I'm sure that I could have broken even if you consider how much the Ranger has cost me in additional fuel costs. Although I'm confident that this little Ranger will last for years, I'm afraid that I will be trading it earlier than I would have wanted to find something that is not such a gas guzzler. see full Ford Ranger review
2008 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Ford needs to wake up to the cost of gas - All you can get now in a 4x4 is the 4.0L engine - That motor eats gas. Ford I want the option of a 3.0 L and even a 2.3L 4x4 see full Ford Ranger review
2006 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
With todays gas prices I would have liked to have the option of a smaller motor. The 4.0L can really drink fuel see full Ford Ranger review
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
I average anywhere between 16 and 19 mpg, I believe that Ford could achieve alot better fuel economy out of a truck the size of a Ranger that doesnt even have a V8 see full Ford Ranger review
2003 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
I averaged 15-16mpg in mixed driving during the summer. About 11-12mpg in the winter. On long trips I could get 18-20mpg, but the best I ever got out of it was 23mpg going down the I80 into California. see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
I would always like to get better gas mileage but considering mine is 4WD and has the larger engine, the gas mileage is not that bad. I would not want to give up power to get better gas mileage. I do feel Ford could improve on fuel economy. see full Ford Ranger review
2001 2dr Regular Cab 6ft bed 119-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed manual RWD
V-6 fuel economy in a 4 cyl. No matter what I do it gets 20 mpg. should be better see full Ford Ranger review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Camry

Toyota Camry Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2015 The SE's grippier tires knock the Toyota Camry Hybrid's EPA ratings down from 43/39 to 40/38. The Ford Fusion Hybrid tests better, 44/41, while the Honda Accord Hybrid tests far better, 50/45. Then there's the real world, where, according to the cars' trip computers, my suburban average was in the low 40s in all three (the Lincoln MKZ standing in for the Fusion) and topped 50 on trips with no unexpected stops (i.e. any braking could be gradual enough to rely almost entirely on energy regeneration rather than the friction brakes). The Camry Hybrid acheived the best reported mpg on my standard school-to-home run--an astounding 70.6--but it started this particular trip with a eight bars in the battery pack (fully charged) and ended it with just two. You can only drive two, maybe three miles on electricity, but when the route totals 7.5 miles even a couple with the gas engine off can generously pad the average. On a 70-mph highway the Camry's trip computer reported averages in the low 40s. I wasn't able to test the Honda on the highway. The Lincoln MKZ hybrid's reported somewhat better numbers than the Camry's, but there's not a large percentage difference between 43.7 and 47.4. Any number of factors besides the cars themselves (trip computer accuracy, driving speed, wind conditions) could account for this difference. Frankly, I'm mightly impressed by any midsize sedan that can consistently average over 40 mpg, as these all can with light-footed acceleration and (especially) braking. see full Toyota Camry review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Camry

Toyota Camry Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
gas won.t stay where it is. A 40% increase in mpg will pay off in less than 6 years see full Toyota Camry review
2012 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
There is a bug in this SW, it removed ALL my "like" comments!! Will redo best can remember for my XLE 4 cyl w/leather/conv pkg/entune. Measured actual mpg 33 in mixed hwy/city driving first tank 210 miles. Got 40mpg best case 70mph 40 mi no wind see full Toyota Camry review
2012 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
The car is returning 46 mpg in town and 40 on hi-way trips. High Speed (65-70 mph)trips return 36 mpg. And that is with air conditioning. see full Toyota Camry review
2012 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Highway economy: 40mpg City economy: 25 mpg My average: 29.3 mpg see full Toyota Camry review
2011 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
First tank of gas yielded 28.75 MPG! This was a mix of city and highway driving while varying speeds during break in so there was never much of a constant speed. Made no attempt to maximize economy. see full Toyota Camry review
2011 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
First tank of gas yielded 28.75 MPG--not bad considering mix of city and rural with no long constant cruise. Also ambient temperature was from 5-20 degrees. see full Toyota Camry review
2010 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
34mpg on regular see full Toyota Camry review
2009 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
Getting almost 40mpg vs. 21-23mpg on the murano. see full Toyota Camry review
2009 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
I average between 31 and 35.4 MPG which is more than twice what my SUV gets! I have "learned" how to drive in a more fuel efficient way using the MPG gauge and the fuel economy charts built into the Nav unit. see full Toyota Camry review
2009 4dr Sedan 187-horsepower 2.4L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
Although rated at 32/34 the reports list the mileage as higher see full Toyota Camry review
Toyota Camry Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
see prior page see full Toyota Camry review
2012 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
After 6000 miles the car averages around 24 mpg city and 27.4 mpg highway. The latest response from the dealer is the milage will improve after I have driven 12,000 miles . That is the fourth milestone i have been told to reach for better fuel economy. The dealer refused to put the car in the shop to check out this problem. Last week i drove 286 miles to Louisville, KY and back with 246 miles on interstate highways at 65 mph. I drove with the Eco light lite with slow acceleration. I have spoken with other 2012 owners and they report the same milage. The conclusion I have reached on the average milage listed on this web site is by people who do know how to accurately figure fuel milage. see full Toyota Camry review
2007 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Not nearly as good as advertised see full Toyota Camry review
2007 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed automatic FWD
Highway is great but in the city driving it drops to about 16-17 miles per gallon. see full Toyota Camry review
2003 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Get s only 23-26 mpg v-v 28-30 for Accord. see full Toyota Camry review
2003 4dr Sedan 157-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD
Fuel economy is as expected, not great. It's a heavy car with an old engine and AWD. Short trips in the city, and it's fairly horrible. On the highway, it's particularly sensitive to speed, as the car is not very aerodynamic. I got as bad as 16 l/100 Km in the city, and as low as 8.8 l/100 Km on long trips. I believe the advertised 8.5 highway is possible if the trip is highway only. see full Toyota Camry review
2002 4dr Sedan 192-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
While it gets up to 28 mpg on the highway it only gets 14 to 18 mpg city. see full Toyota Camry review