| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Acura MDX and 2015 BMW 3-Series Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Model | Acura MDX | BMW 3-Series | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,751 mm | 2,809 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,867 mm | 4,625 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,994 mm | 1,811 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,732 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,064 kg | 1,608 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 79 L | 60 L | 19 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 1,026 mm | 995 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,565 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 973 mm | 7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,562 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,501 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 889 mm | 94 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 953 mm | 0 mm | 953 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,450 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,067 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 739 mm | 0 mm | 739 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,769 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,956 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 496 L | -71 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,215 L | 17.5 | -16.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,364 L | 1,501 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Acura MDX
| 2012 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The interior prioritizes appearance over actual utility; it's surprisingly cramped for such a large vehicle. For example, my Highlander is roughly the same size externally but seems downright cavernous on the inside in comparison. A rear passenger can fully stretch out in the Toyota. Not so in the Acura. see full Acura MDX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series
| 2015 BMW 3-Series Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The BMW 3-Series used to be tight inside, but it has grown with each redesign, especially the most recent one. The rear seat of the current sedan isn't nearly as roomy as that in the related 3-Series Gran Turismo hatchback. But it offers considerably more rear legroom than direct competitors like the Audi A4, Cadillac ATS, and Mercedes-Benz C-Class. In fact, combined front and rear legroom is the same as in the one size-class up, ten-inch-longer Mercedes E-Class. (You do get a half-inch more rear headroom and nearly two inches more rear shoulder room in the Benz.) Beyond the specs, the BMW's rear seat is comfortably high off the floor, a rarity in the age of sedans with plunging coupe-like roof lines. see full BMW 3-Series review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
