MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Cadillac CTS vs. Nissan Rogue Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS and 524 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Rogue.

Cadillac CTS km/L

Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2016 52.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2011 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 54.1 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 42.9 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 60.0 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 35.9 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 53.2 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 46.7 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 46.3 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 46.3 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 53.1 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 55.1 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 45.4 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 47.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 45.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 43.3 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 41.5 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 45.1 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 48.7 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 47.5 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 51.2 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 49.9 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 51.6 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 60.2 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2003 33.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2016 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 0 0 60 40 70 52.1  
2011 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med hvy 23 40 13 23 83 17.0  
2010 4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills light light 0 5 2 93 60 54.1  
2010 4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat v.lt none 0 64 3 34 70 42.9  
2010 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light none 0 0 0 100 70 60.0  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 hills lead light 10 8 39 44 62 35.9  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 hills lead light 5 5 35 55 65 31.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 hills med hvy 11 16 21 53 71 53.2  
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 3 18 42 37 57 46.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 10 32 34 24 72 46.3  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 4 23 42 31 70 46.3  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 hills med light 8 25 15 53 75 53.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light none 1 6 19 74 70 55.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med light 0 0 83 17 70 45.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 4 9 9 78 71 47.8  
2007 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 mtns lead light 0 0 70 30 60 45.9  
2006 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med hvy 15 50 0 35 70 43.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat lead light 25 10 5 60 85 49.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 7 11 11 72 80 41.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat light none 5 20 50 25 100 7.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 7 20 50 23 67 45.1  
2005 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 7 13 24 57 69 48.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med none 2 15 35 48 60 47.5  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 flat med light 8 12 33 47 69 51.2  
2004 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 0 0 30 70 67 49.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 flat med none 7 25 24 45 66 51.6  
2004 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 10 10 0 80 70 60.2  
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 flat med light 10 17 33 40 91 33.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

Nissan Rogue km/L

Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2018 81.1 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2017 75.0 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2017 11.6 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2016 62.3 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2016 51.7 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2015 70.9 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2015 30.9 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2014 57.6 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2012 34.2 MPG Highway Percentage 13 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2012 55.3 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2011 63.6 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2011 44.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 28.0 MPG Highway Percentage 32 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 57.3 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 8.6 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 64.3 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 30.7 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 53.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 28.1 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 57.4 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 60.0 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 48.9 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2018 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 hills light hvy 0 10 10 80 65 81.1  
2017 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light none 2 20 3 75 75 75.0  
2017 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat med none 0 0 10 90 110 11.6  
2016 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 5 15 20 60 60 62.3  
2016 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light hvy 10 30 40 20 60 51.7  
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat med none 1 7 14 78 64 70.9  
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 5 30 30 35 63 30.9  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 3 0 87 10 70 57.6  
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills light light 0 28 60 13 110 34.2  
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 2 3 59 36 69 55.3  
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med light 18 44 6 33 64 63.6  
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 14 17 19 50 75 44.4  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 12 12 44 32 90 28.0  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light light 2 7 44 48 67 57.3  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med hvy 0 35 45 20 100 8.6  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med light 9 29 5 58 73 64.3  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 3 36 17 44 89 30.7  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med light 4 25 23 48 67 53.1  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 hills light light 11 13 10 66 89 28.1  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 flat light none 5 9 29 57 66 57.4  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light light 18 25 18 40 71 60.0  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med none 5 28 15 51 71 48.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Rogue fuel economy data.

Cadillac CTS vs. Nissan Rogue Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Cadillac CTS and Nissan Rogue's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans, Wagons, and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models and Nissan models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review
Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 Though more fuel-efficient than heavier, truck-based SUVs, crossovers have remained much less fuel-efficient than lower, lighter, more aerodynamic cars. Especially if they are equipped with all-wheel-drive (AWD), which adds weight and drivetrain friction. Still, their efficiency has been improving. With EPA ratings of 25 mpg city, 32 mpg highway, the all-wheel-drive 2014 Nissan Rogue is the most fuel efficient compact crossover. (Add one mpg for the front-wheel-drive Rogue.) The new Subaru Forester comes close, with 24/32, followed by the Mazda CX-5 (24/30) and Mitsubishi Outlander (24/29). The Ford Escape (22/30), Honda CR-V (22/30) and Toyota RAV4 (22/29) lag behind the others. In the real world, the Rogue had no trouble beating the EPA estimates. In suburban driving the trip computer typically reported averages between 27 and 31. On one 65-mph highway run downtown, the trip computer reported 40.6 on the way there, then 27.9 on the return. Wind? That, and perhaps my foot wasn't as light. Though the latter figure is much less impressive, the two-way average of 34 is quite good for an all-wheel-drive crossover, especially with the outside temperature just above freezing. I tested the Subaru Forester in colder weather with a lot of snow on the roads, so unfortunately I cannot provide comparable real-world figures for it. The averages I did observe plus the EPA estimates suggest it should be not quite as efficient, but close enough that I'm calling this one a tie. Unless you don't need all-wheel-drive. Then the Rogue has an edge. Notably, both vehicles have continuously variable transmissions (CVTs). see full Nissan Rogue review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 I drive in an area of constant small hills and was 'forced' into AWD: milage by trip computer is only 27 after 30000 miles, but this is probably pretty good for the terrain and vehicle size. see full Nissan Rogue review
2013 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 My other vehicle is a V6. Good on gas is a plus. see full Nissan Rogue review
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Good fuel economy, with an average of 24 mpg with mixed driving. see full Nissan Rogue review
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 Great. I average 9 litres/100km. 31.38 MPG Canadian or 26.15 MPG US see full Nissan Rogue review
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Still waiting to see if the 22/26 mpg pan out.... see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Reasonably good in the small SUV category. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Had the Rogue for a 6 hour test drive. Highway mileage was 8.1litres/100km on the highway at 120K and in town was 9.3. I feel this is very good for this size of a vehicle with this much room and comfort. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 CVT makes mileage consistante between city and highway see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD		 Disappointed! I get around 22 total if I'm lucky. Even in highway driving, I never get near the EPA upper end. I do run the A/C almost all the time, since I live in South Florida, but compared to other vehicles I have, it still is pretty bad. see full Nissan Rogue review
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD		 Hey - an AWD SUV that gets around 24 mpg? Sweet. see full Nissan Rogue review
Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 Got the Rogue instead of a Murano, based on reviews and mileage...maybe something wrong but gettting terrible mileage avg just under 20 combined with lots of hwy driving..will wait till 100K probably then do a full head to toe...dealersaid they found nothing wrong-hmpf! see full Nissan Rogue review