MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Murano vs. Hyundai Genesis Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 693 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Murano and 133 fuel economy reports for the Hyundai Genesis.

Nissan Murano L/100km

Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2015 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2014 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 32 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2013 10.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2013 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2012 11.0 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2011 11.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2011 12.0 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2010 10.5 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2010 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2009 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2009 12.5 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2007 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2007 11.6 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2007 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2006 12.5 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2006 12.5 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2006 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2005 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2005 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2005 13.2 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2004 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2004 12.0 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2004 12.4 MPG Highway Percentage 29 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2003 12.5 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Murano Nissan Murano 2003 12.0 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2015 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
7-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med none 0 100 0 0 9.3  
2014 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat light light 2 0 67 32 70 10.9  
2013 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light none 1 5 24 70 75 10.5  
2013 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat light none 5 16 16 63 102 11.8  
2012 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat light none 1 0 36 63 71 11.0  
2011 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light light 5 10 30 55 60 11.6  
2011 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat med light 4 46 16 34 89 12.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light light 0 0 50 50 60 10.5  
2010 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat light light 9 15 26 49 62 11.2  
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light light 11 27 20 42 64 10.6  
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 hills med none 1 48 14 36 77 12.5  
2007 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light light 5 24 31 40 70 11.2  
2007 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat med light 9 21 16 55 68 11.6  
2007 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 hills med hvy 8 8 8 78 73 10.9  
2006 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat med light 12 31 26 31 65 12.5  
2006 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat med light 10 32 22 36 71 12.5  
2006 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat med none 17 0 53 30 70 11.3  
2005 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light light 13 17 21 49 73 11.3  
2005 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat med none 10 21 21 48 66 11.3  
2005 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 flat light light 4 38 13 45 88 13.2  
2004 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat med hvy 11 49 14 27 60 11.3  
2004 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat med light 10 25 22 43 73 12.0  
2004 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 hills med light 6 14 51 29 70 12.4  
2003 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 2 27 23 48 59 12.5  
2003 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 flat light light 15 21 14 49 87 12.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Murano fuel economy data.

Hyundai Genesis L/100km

Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2015 8.0 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2015 12.3 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2015 7.7 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2012 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 84 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2012 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 61 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2011 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2010 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 64 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2010 11.3 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2009 11.6 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Hyundai Genesis Hyundai Genesis 2009 10.4 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2015 4dr Sedan 420-horsepower 5.0L V8
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 hills med none 3 3 0 95 73 8.0  
2015 4dr Sedan 311-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 9 37 28 27 79 12.3  
2015 4dr Sedan 311-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 0 12 8 80 70 7.7  
2012 4dr Sedan 429-horsepower 5.0L V8
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 1 10 4 84 74 9.3  
2012 4dr Sedan 333-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 2 5 33 61 73 9.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat light light 8 6 31 55 76 10.4  
2010 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med hvy 5 9 22 64 70 10.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med hvy 4 16 39 42 77 11.3  
2009 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 11 21 34 34 73 11.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 9 19 22 51 79 10.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Hyundai Genesis fuel economy data.

Nissan Murano vs. Hyundai Genesis Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Nissan Murano and Hyundai Genesis's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models and Hyundai models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Murano

Nissan Murano Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2015 Within today's Nissan, fuel economy seems a far higher priority than performance. The Murano's base engine remains a naturally aspirated, port-injected 3.5-liter V6 good for 265 horsepower. In some applications Nissan's V6 can be thirsty. But in the Murano it's somehow efficient. Much credit is likely due the CVT (continuously variable transmission). Together the pair achieves EPA ratings of 21 mpg city, 28 mpg highway with either drive train--very good for a crossover of this size and power. Ford also offers a naturally-aspirated, port-injected 3.5-liter V6, but rated for 280 horsepower. Paired with a six-speed automatic it manages only 18/26 with front-wheel drive (FWD) and 17/25 with all-wheel drive (AWD)--well short of the Nissan's figures. A new performance engine, a 315-horsepower turbocharged, direct-injected 2.7-liter V6, earns ratings similar to the 3.5's. The new base engine, a 245-horsepower turbocharged, direct-injected, 2.0-liter four-cylinder, does about as well as the Nissan's V6, 20/30 with FWD and 20/28 with AWD. But a four never sounds or feels as a good as a V6, even if it is as strong. If we compare apples to apples, the Nissan scores a clear win on fuel economy. I wasn't able to drive either car on my regular route, so I cannot comment yet on real-world fuel economy. My experiences in other Nissans and Fords suggest that the Nissan's advantage will be larger in typical driving. see full Nissan Murano review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Murano

Nissan Murano Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 Good fuel economy for an SUV and has powerful engine. see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 My average is well above the EPA estimate of 19- mine is closer to 24-25, with combo city and highway driving. Once at a steady speed, the MPGs hover at 27-33 at both 40mph and 75 mph see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 My previous vehicle was a Mazda Tribute which was a smaller SUV by comparison. Exact same type of driving got me about 17 mpg vs 21 mpg w/the Murano. I get better mileage than the EPA lists for the vehicle because I hypermile when I can. see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 Once you are at a steady speed, the MPG climb to above 30mpg easily, whether at 30 MPH or 75MPH. My average mileage is above 24MPG- 5 MPG better than the EPA estimate see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 Once at a constant speed, the MPG hovers between 27-32- much better then the EPA estimates. My average MPG with combined city and highway driving is 24- 5MPG better than the EPA tests. see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 Good on gas, about 24 mpg on the highway. see full Nissan Murano review
2006 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 The In car Computer Tells me that It Averages over 30 MPG on the Highway, and over 22 in the city, the range is just under 600km on 89 octane fuel. see full Nissan Murano review
2006 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 I get 21 around town, and 25+ highway which I think is very good for a vehicle this size and weight. see full Nissan Murano review
2003 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 Good due to CVT transmission in balance with its HP. see full Nissan Murano review
2003 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 Saved me a ton of money in gas and insurance see full Nissan Murano review
Nissan Murano Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 Uses Premium gas see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 Wish it was better with the CVT see full Nissan Murano review
2009 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 Fuel economy in town has been below 16MPG. It’s not bad, but the lack of economy does not deliver exciting performance as it does with other similarly sized SUV’s that get comparable mileage. see full Nissan Murano review
2007 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 Excellent. see full Nissan Murano review
2006 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 For a midsize SUV is very good at 22-23MPG on the HWY. But still is not much, especially at $3.50 per gallon! see full Nissan Murano review
2005 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD		 Fuel economy is fine for me. I get 22-24mpg without the trailer, a light gas peddle foot, and under 70mph, But if you accelerate fast and drive fast without reguard to MPG you will easily slip into the 18mpg range. With trailer MPG is 13-15. see full Nissan Murano review
2003 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT AWD		 if you are worried about fuel economy buy an economy car. i pay for the power. see full Nissan Murano review
2003 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6
CVT FWD		 since day one. I did the calculation about the Fuel Economy and it never went over 16MPG. the computer on board is not correct when it tells you 21 or 23 MPG I drove this car since it has 5 miles till now which is almost 100,000 Miles. Fuel Economy 15MPG see full Nissan Murano review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Hyundai Genesis

Hyundai Genesis Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
2009 While competitors have been switching to relatively small turbocharged engines, the Genesis continues to rely on larger normally aspirated ones. Even the base car's 3.8-liter V6 is nearly twice the size of the Audi's turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine. Also, Hyundai doesn't yet offer automatic stop/start. The most significant impact: the Genesis gets much worse fuel economy. With two-wheel drive, the A6 2.0T scored 24 mpg city, 35 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, the Genesis 3.8 only 18/29. Add all-wheel drive, and the Audi's ratings fall to 22/32, the Hyundai's to 16/25, not good. Hyundai has developed a new turbocharged 3.3-liter V6 to replace the 3.8, but it isn't clear how soon this new, more efficient and more powerful engine will be available in the Genesis G80. It won't be available when the car arrives this summer, so most likely the 2018 model year. According to the trip computer, my real-world fuel economy was well above the EPA figures. Only when I drove the Genesis fairly aggressively did the trip computer average fall below 20 mpg. On my usual suburban route it averaged around 23 mpg, and on a 70-mph highway it averaged about 30 mpg. The former was still a few mpg short of the Audi, but the latter was at least as good. If the trip computer is accurate, the fuel economy of the Genesis isn't nearly as dismal as the EPA ratings indicate. see full Hyundai Genesis review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Hyundai Genesis

Hyundai Genesis Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Sedan 333-horsepower 3.8L V6
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 This is my second Genesis. First one was a 2010 4.6L and this has the 6 cyl and it is nearly as quick but gets better fuel mileage. I get in the high 20's on the highway. Used to get 25 to 27 in the 8cyl. This 2012 has an 8 speed transmission compared to the 2010's 7 speed. see full Hyundai Genesis review
2010 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 about average for a V8, nothing special see full Hyundai Genesis review
Hyundai Genesis Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 I would like the economy to be higher... 20-28 range see full Hyundai Genesis review
2009 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.8L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 With all the added technology, I would have expected better mileage. I average slightly less than 20 MPH and that is the same as an older heavier STS without the latest and greatest engine management features. see full Hyundai Genesis review
2009 4dr Sedan 375-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Others say they are getting the 18 to 24 MPG claimed. I find that when I do 80% "suburban driving" (strip malls, lights, in/out of car, etc), I get 16 at best. When I am doing 80 on the highway w/ cruise control, I get 23-26. see full Hyundai Genesis review