| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Nissan Rogue and 2015 Acura MDX Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Nissan Rogue | Acura MDX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.9 in | 111.0 in | -5.1 in |
| Length | 182.9 in | 193.6 in | -10.7 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 77.2 in | -6.3 in |
| Height | 65.3 in | 66.7 in | -1.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3267 lb. | 4025 lb. | -758 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 19.5 gal. | -3.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 38.1 in | 2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.9 in | 61.1 in | -5.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.1 in | 57.5 in | -4.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 41.4 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 38.3 in | 0 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.6 in | 59.1 in | -5.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.2 in | 57.8 in | -6.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.3 in | 36.6 in | -1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.6 in | -35.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 54.7 in | -54.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 40.6 in | -40.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 28.1 in | -28.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 106.1 in (over 3 rows) | -28.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 28.9 ft3 | 14.8 ft3 | 14.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 28.9 | 38.4 ft3 | -9.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 57.9 ft3 | 68.4 ft3 | -10.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan Rogue
| 2010 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Not great, not awful. Compared to my previous BMW 535i, it's awful, but for the class of vehicle it's OK for shorter distances, which is mostly what I use it for. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
holds my three young kids comfortably, like the flat foot room. I don't like the front seats, I find them too flat and I don't like that they dont tilt back like my TSX see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Picked up one of my fat friends while on the test ride and had him ride in the back. Him and his wife were very comfortable. Lots of leg and foot room. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
Lots of leg room and the drivers seat is very adjustable and comfortable. I have wide shoulders and the leather seats are very comfortable for me. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 Nissan Rogue Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Front seats too bench like and lacking in adjustments see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT FWD |
Roof pitch makes it seem more cramped. see full Nissan Rogue review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4 CVT AWD |
uncomfortable for 6 ft 2 in driver see full Nissan Rogue review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX
| 2015 Acura MDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| That's it for the significant advantages of the new Acura MDX. Most things it does well, but not significantly better than the generally good segment averages. It's quick, but not thrillingly so. The front seats are comfortable and supportive, and cushier than those in the Infiniti, but provide less lateral support than those in the smaller Acura RDX and are no match in comfort or support for those in a BMW X5, a Lexus RX, or the big buck Mercedes reviewed a few weeks ago. Ride quality, like the seats, is good but short of luxurious. With additional sound deadening and laminated front door glass, the 2014 MDX is quieter than the 2013, but this only brings it in line with the others. By the same token, there aren't many clear reasons to reject the 2014 MDX. The most obvious follows from its relatively compact size: though (as already mentioned) cargo volume is more than competitive, there's less room in the rearmost row than in the QX60. By sliding the second row up a couple of inches (it has a half-foot of travel), adults of middling size will fit back there. But with their butt low and knees high they won't be comfortable. The QX60 offers far more combined legroom based on the spec sheets, and a couple more inches in the real world. (The Acura's specs seem to under-represent reality for passengers even as they might over-represent it for cargo.) But the Infiniti's seats are flatter and less comfortable. The new Hyundai Santa Fe offers more legroom than the Infiniti, while Ford's large crossovers could be best of all for transporting up to seven adults--if still not as good as the typical minivan. see full Acura MDX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Acura MDX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
