We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan Rogue vs. Cadillac CTS MPG

Chart is based on 524 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Rogue and 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS.

Nissan Rogue MPG

Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2018 34.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2017 31.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2017 27.2 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2016 26.5 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2016 22.0 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2015 30.1 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2015 22.5 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2014 24.5 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2012 23.2 MPG Highway Percentage 13 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2012 23.5 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2011 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2011 24.8 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 24.4 MPG Highway Percentage 32 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 26.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2010 20.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 27.3 MPG Highway Percentage 58 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 23.0 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2009 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 26.4 MPG Highway Percentage 66 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 25.8 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Nissan Rogue Nissan Rogue 2008 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2018 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
hills light hvy 0 10 10 80 65 34.5  
2017 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
flat light none 2 20 3 75 75 31.9  
2017 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat med none 0 0 10 90 110 27.2  
2016 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
flat light hvy 5 15 20 60 60 26.5  
2016 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light hvy 10 30 40 20 60 22.0  
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
flat med none 1 7 14 78 64 30.1  
2015 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light light 5 30 30 35 63 22.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light none 3 0 87 10 70 24.5  
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
hills light light 0 28 60 13 110 23.2  
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light none 2 3 59 36 69 23.5  
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
hills med light 18 44 6 33 64 27.0  
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light light 14 17 19 50 75 24.8  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
flat light light 12 12 44 32 90 24.4  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light light 2 7 44 48 67 26.1  
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
flat med hvy 0 35 45 20 100 20.2  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
hills med light 9 29 5 58 73 27.3  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light none 3 36 17 44 89 23.0  
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
flat med light 4 25 23 48 67 22.6  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
hills light light 11 13 10 66 89 26.4  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
flat light none 5 9 29 57 66 25.8  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD
flat light light 18 25 18 40 71 25.5  
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
flat med none 5 28 15 51 71 22.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Rogue fuel economy data.

Cadillac CTS MPG

Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2016 22.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2011 18.0 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 23.0 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 18.2 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 25.5 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 15.3 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 13.2 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 22.6 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 19.8 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 19.7 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 19.7 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 22.5 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 23.4 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 19.3 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 20.3 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 19.5 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 18.4 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 21.3 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 16.8 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 19.2 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 20.7 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 20.2 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 23.9 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 21.2 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 21.9 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 25.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2003 22.9 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2016 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 0 0 60 40 70 22.1  
2011 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med hvy 23 40 13 23 83 18.0  
2010 4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills light light 0 5 2 93 60 23.0  
2010 4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat v.lt none 0 64 3 34 70 18.2  
2010 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 0 0 0 100 70 25.5  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills lead light 10 8 39 44 62 15.3  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
hills lead light 5 5 35 55 65 13.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills med hvy 11 16 21 53 71 22.6  
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 3 18 42 37 57 19.8  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 10 32 34 24 72 19.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 4 23 42 31 70 19.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
hills med light 8 25 15 53 75 22.5  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 1 6 19 74 70 23.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills med light 0 0 83 17 70 19.3  
2007 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 4 9 9 78 71 20.3  
2007 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
mtns lead light 0 0 70 30 60 19.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med hvy 15 50 0 35 70 18.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat lead light 25 10 5 60 85 21.0  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 11 11 72 80 21.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat light none 5 20 50 25 100 16.8  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 20 50 23 67 19.2  
2005 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 7 13 24 57 69 20.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat med none 2 15 35 48 60 20.2  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 8 12 33 47 69 23.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 0 30 70 67 21.2  
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 7 25 24 45 66 21.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 10 10 0 80 70 25.6  
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 10 17 33 40 91 22.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

Nissan Rogue vs. Cadillac CTS MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Nissan Rogue and Cadillac CTS's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models and Cadillac models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 Though more fuel-efficient than heavier, truck-based SUVs, crossovers have remained much less fuel-efficient than lower, lighter, more aerodynamic cars. Especially if they are equipped with all-wheel-drive (AWD), which adds weight and drivetrain friction. Still, their efficiency has been improving. With EPA ratings of 25 mpg city, 32 mpg highway, the all-wheel-drive 2014 Nissan Rogue is the most fuel efficient compact crossover. (Add one mpg for the front-wheel-drive Rogue.) The new Subaru Forester comes close, with 24/32, followed by the Mazda CX-5 (24/30) and Mitsubishi Outlander (24/29). The Ford Escape (22/30), Honda CR-V (22/30) and Toyota RAV4 (22/29) lag behind the others. In the real world, the Rogue had no trouble beating the EPA estimates. In suburban driving the trip computer typically reported averages between 27 and 31. On one 65-mph highway run downtown, the trip computer reported 40.6 on the way there, then 27.9 on the return. Wind? That, and perhaps my foot wasn't as light. Though the latter figure is much less impressive, the two-way average of 34 is quite good for an all-wheel-drive crossover, especially with the outside temperature just above freezing. I tested the Subaru Forester in colder weather with a lot of snow on the roads, so unfortunately I cannot provide comparable real-world figures for it. The averages I did observe plus the EPA estimates suggest it should be not quite as efficient, but close enough that I'm calling this one a tie. Unless you don't need all-wheel-drive. Then the Rogue has an edge. Notably, both vehicles have continuously variable transmissions (CVTs). see full Nissan Rogue review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Rogue

Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2014 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
I drive in an area of constant small hills and was 'forced' into AWD: milage by trip computer is only 27 after 30000 miles, but this is probably pretty good for the terrain and vehicle size. see full Nissan Rogue review
2013 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
My other vehicle is a V6. Good on gas is a plus. see full Nissan Rogue review
2012 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Good fuel economy, with an average of 24 mpg with mixed driving. see full Nissan Rogue review
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
Great. I average 9 litres/100km. 31.38 MPG Canadian or 26.15 MPG US see full Nissan Rogue review
2011 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Still waiting to see if the 22/26 mpg pan out.... see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Reasonably good in the small SUV category. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Had the Rogue for a 6 hour test drive. Highway mileage was 8.1litres/100km on the highway at 120K and in town was 9.3. I feel this is very good for this size of a vehicle with this much room and comfort. see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
CVT makes mileage consistante between city and highway see full Nissan Rogue review
2010 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT FWD
Disappointed! I get around 22 total if I'm lucky. Even in highway driving, I never get near the EPA upper end. I do run the A/C almost all the time, since I live in South Florida, but compared to other vehicles I have, it still is pretty bad. see full Nissan Rogue review
2009 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
CVT AWD
Hey - an AWD SUV that gets around 24 mpg? Sweet. see full Nissan Rogue review
Nissan Rogue Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT AWD
Got the Rogue instead of a Murano, based on reviews and mileage...maybe something wrong but gettting terrible mileage avg just under 20 combined with lots of hwy driving..will wait till 100K probably then do a full head to toe...dealersaid they found nothing wrong-hmpf! see full Nissan Rogue review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review
Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review