| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota RAV4 and 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2014 | |
| Model | Toyota RAV4 | Mercedes-Benz GL | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,659 mm | 3,073 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,600 mm | 5,121 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,816 mm | 1,941 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,524 kg | 2,450 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 100 L | -40 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 978 mm | -5 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 945 mm | 988 mm | -43 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,336 mm | 1,283 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 762 mm | 889 mm | -127 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,891 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 348 L | 453 L | -105 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,053 L | 1,399 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,067 L | 2,656 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota RAV4
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Easy access for us older folk and plenty of room once we get there. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 Toyota RAV4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
back seat is hard, not much leg room see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
no lumbar support see full Toyota RAV4 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Harder seats than in the Murano, and now in a good way. The Murano has power lumbar support, letting you melt in the seat as much as you wish. Better lateral support in the Murano as well. see full Toyota RAV4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
