MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Volkswagen Eos vs. Mazda CX-5 Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos and 156 fuel economy reports for the Mazda CX-5.

Volkswagen Eos km/L

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 70.6 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 72.9 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 66.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 67.7 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 63.7 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 118.6 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 55.9 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 49.4  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 70.6  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 72.9  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 66.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 67.7  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 63.7  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 118.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 55.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Mazda CX-5 km/L

Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2021 13.9 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2019 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2016 69.8 MPG Highway Percentage 76 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2016 68.9 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2016 33.9 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2015 60.5 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2015 61.0 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2014.5 13.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2014 13.5 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2014 71.2 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2014 59.1 MPG Highway Percentage 19 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2014 63.3 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2013 55.6 MPG Highway Percentage 27 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2013 67.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mazda CX-5 Mazda CX-5 2013 83.0 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2021 4dr SUV 162-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 hills light light 0 10 20 70 110 13.9  
2019 4dr SUV 192-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat light none 5 5 25 65 80 11.8  
2016 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat med hvy 3 2 19 76 67 69.8  
2016 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med none 1 3 37 60 62 68.9  
2016 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 1 10 33 56 79 33.9  
2015 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 2 15 17 65 70 60.5  
2015 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med light 6 6 55 33 66 61.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2014.5 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light none 0 50 0 50 110 13.4  
2014 4dr SUV turbocharged 173hp 2.2L I4 Diesel
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med light 0 10 60 30 110 13.5  
2014 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 3 23 22 53 64 71.2  
2014 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills light light 0 14 67 19 71 59.1  
2014 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 hills med hvy 20 0 50 30 65 63.3  
2013 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD		 flat light light 12 34 27 27 71 55.6  
2013 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 flat med hvy 8 5 48 40 65 67.2  
2013 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 2 5 5 88 60 83.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mazda CX-5 fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos vs. Mazda CX-5 Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Volkswagen Eos and Mazda CX-5's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Volkswagen models and Mazda models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the 2001 Mazda CX-5

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the 2001 Mazda CX-5.

Be the first!