We are 102,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Safe, inexpensive family car for 5

The Right Car for Me | TrueDelta

ShawnMin

Subaru Outback
Honda Odyssey
Toyota Highlander
Volve XC 90

Looking for a safe, reliable car with decent fuel economy which will carry 3 car seats in the rear. We have a 5 year old who's about to graduate to a booster seat. A 2 year old and a baby due Jan 1.

Open to suggestions!

Priorities: Reliability & durability / Price or payments / Rear seat room & comfort

Need minimum of 5 seats

Will consider both new and used cars
Maximum mileage: 100000
Maximum age: 15 years

Maximum price: US $ 14000

« Return to results

Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own thoughts.

Sort responses by likes

Response from LectroFuel

12:54 am November 25, 2020

The Toyota Highlander would be the best option on your list because it will run for a very long time if it is taken care of. However, the Toyota Sienna is just as reliable and has a lot more space. I would totally go for the Sienna over the Highlander if I had five kids. You don't want to put three kids in car seats in the second or third row of a Highlander. All cars will be similarly safe and efficient. The minivans and Volvo would be expected to fare better in a crash.

If you really want efficiency, the Highlander Hybrid is available, but don't get one too old because the batteries age with time, not mileage. I wouldn't recommend this option as this hybrid system was a little less efficient than the Prius at the time, even considering the large size of the Highlander.

0

Link to this reponse

Toyota Sienna
Toyota Highlander

Response from Sea-Dan

11:29 pm December 1, 2020

LectroFuel is assuming you want a 7 passenger car even though you listed two 5 passenger models (Volvo & Subaru). Actually, w 3 kids, a 7 passenger rig makes a lot of sense, especially if you plan to keep it a long time. He knows his cars and is right on about the Toyotas for a 7 passenger model.
But back to to the 5 passenger models.
Volvo XC 90 is nice alright but will have a higher initial cost and higher maintenence cost than an Outback. If your OK with a 5 seater, a Subaru would be the way to go. You might also consider the Subie Forester. It isn't quite as cushy as the OB, but has a similar amount of room, equipment, and some prefer it -- may also be a couple thousand less for similarly equipped Outback. Many Subie owners put well over 100,000 miles on there without major repairs although about 10% (more if earlier than 2015) use oil, major engine failure is very rare.
Disclosure: I have owned 1 Forester and 2 Outbacks with very little problem (but never kept one beyond 75,000 miles).
Good luck and please let us know what you decide on.

0

Link to this reponse

Subaru Outback
Subaru Forester
Sign in or join TrueDelta to post your own thoughts.

Return to top