8 5 6 8 1

Car Reliability Stats updated, cover through March 31, 2013

June 7th, 2013

The 27th update of TrueDelta’s car reliability stats was recently posted to the public site. This update covers the year ending March 31, 2013. Other sources are nearly a year behind.

Models for which very few repairs have been reported:

Toyota Prius c 4002013 — Hyundai Elantra, Kia Optima, Subaru Impreza / XV Crosstrek, Subaru Outback / Legacy

2012 — Honda CR-V, Honda Fit, Kia Soul, Mercedes-Benz C-Class, Subaru Forester, Toyota Prius, Toyota Prius c

2011 — Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Mazda CX-9, Nissan LEAF

2010 — Lexus RX

Once again we have very few “sad faces” (out of a total of over 400 results):

2013 — Ford Escape (mostly fit and finish issues)

2012 — FIAT 500 (common problems with oil leaks, Bluetooth module, and intermediate steering shaft)

2011 — MINI Cooper (common problems with the thermostat and coolant temp sensor)

2010 — Hyundai Genesis sedan, Jaguar XF, Mercedes-Benz GLK

FR-S old lumber mill 400Few repairs were also reported for the all-new 2013 Honda Accord and updated 2013 Audi A4 and allroad. Among other new 2013s, the Mazda CX-5 and Scion FR-S / Subaru BRZ remain in the “yellow zone” thanks to some common minor problems.

We fell just short of the minimum sample size with a few new-for-2013 models. Only one of the 25 owners responding for the new Ford Fusion reported any repairs, but that one reported multiple repairs, yielding a moderate repair frequency. With the next update this stat will likely improve. The C-MAX isn’t doing as well, with a stat at the high (not good) end of the moderate range. The new Nissan Pathfinder / Infiniti JX35, Acura RDX, and Nissan Altima are all moderate as well, with the last possibly suffering from a few common glitches. Our preliminary stat for the Dodge Dart is the best for this bunch, and just inside the low range. (Then again, the FIAT 500 had a good start that was not sustained.)

To view the stats for a model, and the specific repairs behind the stats:

Car Reliability Survey Results

Total legroom spec

May 7th, 2013

Among my car-related pet peeves, I hate it when I hear that one car has “more rear legroom” than another when such a claim ignores that the other car has significantly more front legroom. Among the ugly secrets of legroom specs is one that should be, but rarely seems to be, obvious: you can move at least the front seat, and alter both front and rear legroom in the process. To avoid making a misleading comparison in my own reviews, I check the total amount of legroom.

Dodge Journey rear seat adjustability 400For example, I recently compared the new 2013 Nissan Pathfinder with the GMC Acadia. According to the official specs, the Acadia has significantly more third-row legroom, 33.2 inches vs. 30.7. But focusing on this spec ignores the fact that the second row can be adjusted fore-and-aft along a roughly half-foot track in either vehicle. The front seat similarly adjusts, like in just about any car. To really compare legroom, we’ve got to sum the specs for all three rows: 41.3+36.8+33.2 for the Acadia vs. 42.3+41.7+30.7 for the Pathfinder. Do this, and you’ll find that the Nissan comes out 3.4 inches ahead, 114.7 vs. 111.3.

We recently improved TrueDelta’s specs pages. Since we were messing with the code anyway, we added a new “total legroom” spec. Now I won’t have to actually do the math. And you won’t, either!

truedelta.com/vehicle-specs

Revised Specs Pages, New Features Pages

May 7th, 2013

Since the beginning of the site I’ve maintained a database with the specs and features for cars sold in the U.S. This database supported our car price and features tool, and our single model specs pages. But if you simply wanted to compare the specs for two models, you had to configure them and see the prices as well. And if you wanted to see all of the features available on a model, well, you couldn’t. I wanted to create pages to provide this information, but never could find the time for it. Luckily, Gayla has. On the specs pages you can now compare two models. And on new features pages you can view all of the standard and optional features for a single car model, or compare those for two car models.

To get to both seats of pages, click the “specs” tab in the nav bar. You’ll also find both listed in the “more about this car” box on each information page.

2014 Cadillac CTS, now a threat to BMW?

March 27th, 2013

Yesterday Cadillac revealed the 2014 CTS at the New York auto show. In its third iteration, will the car finally threaten the dominance of the Germans? In many ways I’m impressed, but in one I’m also discouraged.

Read the rest of this entry »

Chrysler Partners with Carhartt, Journalists Scratch Heads

March 21st, 2013

I attended my first lunch today as a member of the Detroit-based Automotive Press Association. Saad Chehab, CEO of the Chrysler and Lancia brands, presented a new Chrysler 200 S Special Edition, a collaboration between Mopar and Carhartt. Then $28,870 car has been modified with a clean air intake, performance exhaust, sport suspension, black grille, black wheels, and black Carhartt fabric with the firm’s signature triple stitching in gray. Chehab also talked about some other special edition models, including a John Varvatos Special Edition 300C, which includes many intriguing details specified by the designer himself, and a Motown Special Edition 300.

Asked how Carhartt, a manufacturer of sturdy blue collar work clothes, was a better fit for semi-upscale Chrysler than Dodge or Ram, Chehab explained that “Detroit” was Chrysler’s thing, and Carhartt was a Detroit-based company. Also, Chrysler is the brand for hard working people who want nice things without paying a premium price for them, and Carhartt is also about hard work. As is Detroit in the American public mind, apparently.

The journalists in attendance seemed less than convinced. In contrast, the partnership with Varvatos, also approached because he is from Detroit, occasioned no head-scratching.

Read the rest of this entry »

Much better late than never file: GM turbo V6

March 18th, 2013

Cadillac CTS twin turbo 3.6-liter V6Back when GM’s then-future HF V6 engine family first became public knowledge (circa 2000), a twin-turbo 3.6-liter capable of 360 horsepower was part of the plan. Then Bob Lutz put a 400-horsepower 6.0-liter V8 in the 2004 CTS-V instead.

The second generation CTS-V got a 556-horsepower supercharged 6.2-liter V8, opening up a huge gap in the line as the next engine down, a naturally aspirated 3.6, produced just a little over 300 horsepower. A turbocharged 3.6 seemed a most logical candidate to fill this hole, but didn’t happen. Instead, a turbocharged 2.8 (also part of the original plan, IIRC) capable of only 300 horsepower was offered in the 2010 SRX, only to be discontinued after only two model years due to a combination of its high price and disappointing performance and fuel economy.

When Cadillac introduces a new, third-generation, 2014 CTS later this year, they won’t repeat past errors. A 420-horsepower (at 5,750 rpm), twin-turbocharged 3.6-liter V6 will be available. The new engine will produce 430 pound-feet of torque at 3,500 rpm. When mated to a new eight-speed automatic capable of skipping gears, GM forecasts it will earn EPA ratings of 17 mpg city, 25 highway.

A variant of the new engine will also be offered in the Cadillac XTS, where it is also badly needed. Because the XTS has a transverse powertrain, I suspect that the new engine will have to be limited to about 365 horsepower and 350 pound-feet of torque in that application. This is the case with the EcoBoost V6 in the competing Lincoln MKS, which uses a related transmission.

How large can “compact” cars get?

March 12th, 2013

Yes, the Neon in the photo is a second-generation car.

For a compact sedan, the 2013 Dodge Dart is very heavy. One of the reasons it’s very heavy is that it isn’t very compact. Fifteen years ago it would have been considered a midsize car.

Compare the Dart’s size and weight with the 1998 Dodge Neon and 1998 Dodge Stratus:

Dimension Dart Neon Stratus
Wheelbase 106.4 104.0 108.0
Length 183.9 171.8 186.0
Width 72.0 67.6 71.0
Height 57.7 54.8 54.1
Weight 3186 2399 2921

 
Consider interior dimensions, and the picture is murkier:

Dimension Dart Neon Stratus
F Shoulder 58.2 52.5 55.2
F Leg 42.2 42.5 42.3
R Shoulder 56.1 52.3 54.7
R Leg 35.3 35.1 38.1
Trunk 13.1 11.8 15.7

 
The Dart’s interior is midsize in breadth, but not in terms of legroom or cargo space.

Car reliability stats now cover through the end of 2012

March 4th, 2013

We recently updated the stats from TrueDelta’s Car Reliability Survey to include all of 2012. Unless the car in question is a 2010 model, information on how it has been holding up since last April isn’t available anywhere else. Put another way, we’re currently eight months ahead.

With surprisingly few exceptions, cars have been holding up well, and often very well. Here are the fairly new models that received red “sad faces” this time around (out of a total of over 400 results):

2013 Ford Escape front quarter view2013 – Ford Escape

2012 – None

2011 – None

2010 – Jaguar XF, Mercedes GLK, Hyundai Genesis, GM large crossovers, Ford Taurus

2009 – Cadillac CTS, Jaguar XF, Ford Flex

2008 – GM large crossovers, BMW 335i

2007 – Nissan Murano

Another thing to consider: even among the cars in this bunch, none had a repair frequency score in the triple digits. Even the least reliable models for which we had sufficient data averaged under one repair trip per car last year. (Though if four more owners of the 2008 Mercedes GL-Class reported in, I wouldn’t be able to say this. If you’re concerned about reliability, you don’t want one of these.)

Also consider that we count all problems, minor as well as major, and most reported problems are minor. The 2013 Ford Escape is in the “dirty dozen” because of common problems with door and hatch alignments. The 2010 Ford Taurus is here because, even after three years of replacements, the chrome trim keeps peeling off the tail lights of enough cars.

The 2010 Hyundai Genesis has had moderately serious problems with its fuel pump (V8 engine), plus the power tilt adjuster for the steering column and the power seat controls. To avoid a sad face with the 2009 CTS, skip the sunroof. The 2007 Nissan Murano commonly has problems with its front suspension (as does the 2006).

We could move the goalposts to force more models into the sad group, but we don’t want to put a sad face on cars whose owners are usually quite happy. For 2011 and newer cars, the dividing lines between a :) and a :| and then between a :| and a :( are around 30 and 60 repair trips per 100 cars per year, respectively. Most newish cars are under 30 per 100, and consequently get happy faces.

At the other end of the scale, we have some models for which absolutely no repairs were reported last year:

2013 Honda CR-V front quarter view2013 – Audi A4 et al. (29 cars)

2012 – Honda CR-V (58 cars), Subaru Forester (33), Toyota Prius c (30)

2010 – Lexus RX (30 cars)

The 2013 Audi isn’t a fluke–both the 2011 and 2012 have also been faring well. Some other models came close to perfect records. If one more 2012 Rogue owner had responded and reported no repairs, the Nissan would be in this group. Only a single repair was reported for the 2013 Focus, 2012 C-Class, 2012 LEAF, 2012 Prius, 2012 Sienna, 2011 GM large SUVs, 2010 Corolla, 2009 Rogue, and 2008 IS.

Among notable new models, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 barely lost its former happy face due to multiple reports of fluttering hoods, rattling dashes, and vibrating mirrors, while the 2013 Toyobaru FRZ and 2012 FIAT 500 are deep in the yellow. The former has common problems with a chirping fuel pump and tail lamp condensation, while the latter has common problems with defective manifold bolts that cause oil leaks and an iffy Bluetooth module.

On the one hand, a single problem that affects most cars will mean the difference between a great score and a bad one. On the other, manufacturers are doing a very good job of catching and fixing problems before they can become common. Failures are exceptions, not the rule.

To view the stats for a model, and the specific repairs behind the stats:

Car Reliability Survey Results

2014 Mazda6 vs. 2013 Fusion Price Comparison

February 9th, 2013

From the emails I receive, quite a few people have decided that their next car will be either a Ford Fusion or a Mazda6. Might price play much of a role in their decision? I’ve added pricing and features data for the 2014 Mazda6 to TrueDelta’s pricing database to enable a thorough comparison.

Read the rest of this entry »

People who drive a lot drive these cars

January 27th, 2013

Not actually a TDI, but it is a Jetta.

Among the many things we check when preparing the reliability stats are unusually high odometer readings. Some people add an extra zero by mistake. Others simply spend an insane amount of time on the road. The latter is especially likely with two cars: VW’s Golf/Jetta/Rabbit TDIs (diesels) and Toyota’s Prius.

Looking at 2010s, with readings averaged over the past four quarters, the Golf TDIs have an average of 38,500 miles, the Prii 37,097 miles. The Honda Accord? 31,230. With 2004s, the averages are 177,964, 128,137, and 102,181 miles, respectively.

This makes rational sense. Diesels and hybrids both get much better fuel economy than regular cars, but they also cost more. The more miles someone drives, the more quickly this extra cost is recouped. Diesel engines also tend to last longer. Hybrids? The jury’s still out, but a few Prii are now well over the 200k mark.